Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
LLA-TG-3 mice were categorized into three groups according to their tumor burden, that is, no tumor, low or high tumor burden.
Before conducting the study, mice were categorized into three groups (n = 10): (A) sham control (SC), (B) exposed (E1.6), and (C) exposed treated with 30 mg/kg of RG (G1.6).
For experiments in which all four strains were sampled (Experiments 1 3), approximately 9% of mice were categorized as 'unresponsive' during the place-preference tests because they exhibited very low levels of exploratory behavior.
Of mice that were not conditioned (Experiment 1), 19% of A mice and 50% of BALB mice were categorized as unresponsive because they did not leave the peripheral compartment of the arena which was first entered within 20 min of the beginning of the testing session (see Materials and methods).
LLA-TG-3 mice were categorized into three groups according to their tumor burden (no tumor: no visible lesions, age range: 4 8 weeks; low tumor burden: small tumors (2 3 per mouse; size range: approx. 60 100 mm), age range: 5 7 months; high tumor burden: large tumors (2 5 per mouse; size range: approx. 100 160 mm), age range: 7 10 months).
Similar(55)
Mammary tumors in mice are categorized by using morphologic and architectural criteria.
The test group of 240 mice was categorized into 12 groups (20 mice each): Group I included normal control mice.
The dominant Gsdma3 alleles in mice are categorized as nonsense- and missense-mutations (Runkel et al. 2004; Lunny et al. 2005; Tanaka et al. 2007a; Sun et al. 2009; Li et al. 2010; Lei et al. 2011; Zhou et al. 2012).
Relative frequencies of metastasis were determined as follows: each mouse was categorized with category 0 having 0 metastases, category 1 having 1 5 metastases and category 2 having >5 metastases.
The observed knockout mouse phenotypes were categorized according to the anatomical system(s) affected, as described above.
To predict miRNA TSS, all human and mouse miRNAs were categorized as intergenic or intragenic miRNAs.
Related(20)
mice were recognized
individuals were categorized
mice were classified
mice were evaluated
studies were categorized
mice were homogenized
mice were disaggregated
mice were analyzed
mice were summarized
mice were calculated
mice were located
specimens were categorized
birds were categorized
mice were organized
mice were randomized
mice were embedded
mice were averaged
mice were ventilated
mice were seeded
mice were characterised
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com