Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(53)
Individuals were categorized as current smokers or non-smokers (never smokers or ex-smokers).
The younger or older individuals were categorized by the approximated mean age value among controls [i.e., <45 or ≥45 years].
Individuals were categorized as to whether they belonged to one of three legislatively-defined socially marginalized groups: scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, and "other backward classes".
10 individuals were categorized as high emitters of cough droplets.
For marital status, individuals were categorized as "married/common-law" or "widowed/separated/divorced/single".
Baseline characteristics of the HIV-infected individuals were categorized as MSM, HSM, and women (Table 1).
Similar(7)
We were reminded how discrimination works: Individuals are categorized, depersonalized, labeled.
Qualitative process data collected from these individuals was categorized into the following themes: audience, barriers to conducting trainings, and future trainings.
Individuals are categorized as Type D using a standardized cut-off score ≥ 10 on both the negative affectivity and social inhibition subscales.
Finally, our analyses revealed that WHtR can identify adults at cardiometabolic risk, even when such individuals are categorized as 'healthy' or 'normal' according to BMI or WC.
Community affiliations can also be defined in relational terms, where individuals are categorized according to shared histories, identities, and interests regardless of space or residential patterns (Cornish and Ghosh 2007; Abbott and Luke forthcoming).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com