Ai Feedback
Exact(15)
Twenty-five microfiters of mixture was preincubated with 75 μL preincubation solution (50 mmol/L Tris HCl buffer pH 7.0 containing 1 mmol/L glutathione and 50 mmol/L MnCl2) at 37°C for 30 minutes.
The reaction mixture was preincubated at 35°C for 5 min and the reaction was carried out by addition of 20 μl of the enzyme solution for 10 min (standard assay conditions).
The mixture was preincubated on ice at 4°C overnight.
This reaction mixture was preincubated on ice for 30 45 min.
Before the addition of acetaldehyde, the mixture was preincubated for 10 min at 25°C.
Prior to the addition of Tk-SP, the reaction mixture was preincubated at the respective temperatures for 5 min.
Similar(45)
After the mixture being preincubated at 37°C for 5 min, 50 μL 7.6 mmol/L HHL substrate solution, which was solved in 50 mM sodium borate buffer and 6.8 mM NaCl at pH 8.3, was added.
The assay mixtures were preincubated until a constant baseline was obtained and the reaction was started by adding 125 µM insulin.
GCase activities in the tissue and cell lysates were determined as described with 4-methylumbelliferryl β-D-glucopyranoside (4 MU-Glc, 4 mM) as substrate in 0.25% sodium taurocholate and 0.25% Triton X-100 [8]. Assay mixtures were preincubated in the presence and absence of the conduritol B epoxide (CBE, 1 mM), a specific irreversible inhibitor of GCase, for 30 min at 37°C.
Mixtures were preincubated at 37°C for 30 minutes.
Before adding MBP-RacA, the mixtures were preincubated for 15 min at room temperature.
Related(20)
solution was preincubated
mixture was cultured
mixture was strained
mixture was monitored
mixture was set
mixture was poured
mixture was degassed
mixture was sampled
mixture was prepared
mixture was spread
mixture was filtered
mixture was vortexed
mixture was shook
mixture was heated
mixture was separated
mixture was kept
mixture was followed
mixture was touted
mixture was refluxed
mixture was allowed
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com