Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
Despite these differences, molecular clock tests did not reject clock-like evolution for any ML analyses.
A series of molecular clock tests supported these observations.
Molecular clock tests for these trees were performed using the programs Kitsch and Fitch in PHYLIP (Felsenstein 2010).
Since the KN is the number of nonsynonymous substitutions at the non-PBR, we performed molecular clock tests for the substitutions.
The hypothesis of homogeneous rate within alignment of 16S and cyt b genes respectively was not rejected by the molecular clock tests.
Phylogenetic trees inferred from pairwise LCNS−1 data using Xenopus as an outgroup suggest that the rate of divergence in LCNS number is heterogeneous in amniotes, a result confirmed by molecular clock tests (F = 3.53, degrees of freedom = 5, P = 0.04).
Similar(54)
Log-likelihood parameter of molecular clock test.
The molecular clock test was performed to gain further insight into the relative timing of duplication and divergence events.
Previously, a molecular clock test was performed with PAUP* version 4.0b10 [ 35] by estimating the likelihood of the PhyML topology with and without forcing a molecular clock.
Each of the 25,955 genomic segments was subjected to a molecular clock test using a likelihood ratio test (LRT) with a significance level of 5% (Felsenstein 1988).
The strict molecular clock test was performed as described in the manual, however the number of generations was increased to 2,000,000.
Related(18)
molecular clock analyses
molecular screening tests
molecular clock calibrations
molecular clock components
molecular clock studies
molecular clock estimates
molecular oncology tests
molecular biology tests
molecular pathology tests
molecular clock models
molecular clock assumptions
molecular clock calculations
molecular clock data
molecular clock analysis
molecular clock genes
molecular tumour tests
molecular clock test
molecular clock methods
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com