Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
Brains from four mice (three sections from each mouse) were analysed by examining an average of 10 fields per section.
In vitro data and tumour growth in mouse were analysed with the two-tailed Student's t test.
Only RefSeq genes having an annotated transcript with at least four exons and at least two internal fully coding exon in both human and mouse were analysed.
When different tissues of a TgPrP S3.F88W -35 mouse were analysed, the ratios of C2 fragment to C1 or full-length PrPC differed (Fig 3C).
Samples of plasma and livers from each mouse were analysed in duplicate, tumour tissue was pooled, and analysis of analyte in tumour was conducted in triplicate.
Similar(55)
For this purpose, IL-6-deficient (IL6-/) mice were analysed.
Sera from all 47 TgOvPrP4 mice were analysed to see if the three TgOvPrP4 subpopulations could be distinguished by analysing a peripheral tissue in the live animal.
The next 3 4 days Giemsa-stained (1∶10 solution, BDH) blood smears of the infected mice were analysed and the parasitaemia was determined.
Haematoxylin and eosin-stained fetal lung tissue sections of E15.5 to E18.5 Creb1−/− and wildtype mice were analysed for gross morphology using light microscopy.
Protein extracts from spinal cord, brainstem and anterior brain (lacking cerebellum and brainstem) from single and double transgenic mice were analysed in immunoblots for HSP70 and α-synuclein.
Using immunohistochemistry, lungs of E16.5 and E18.5 wildtype and Creb1−/− mice were analysed for expression of these markers as an indicator of proximal epithelial differentiation.
Related(20)
mouse were quantified
mouse were investigated
mouse were calculated
image were analysed
mouse were explored
mouse were assessed
clip were analysed
rat were analysed
mouse were identified
mouse were examined
mouse were evaluated
mouse were assigned
vitro were analysed
rats were analysed
mouse were released
mouse were removed
mouse were processed
mouse were confirmed
mouse were proposed
mouse were collected
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com