Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
In contrast, only background staining was detected when the same transduced cells were incubated with biotinylated GD03-Fc protein.
Very little background staining was detected.
No background staining was detected in wild-type mice following pancreas injury (Supplementary Figure S1).
Unspecific background staining was detected in majority of the tissue sections, and more than half of the tissue sections showed signs of tumour cell EGFL7 expression.
Reactivity for all antibodies was quantified by use of a visual grading system based on the intensity of cytoplasm staining (0 2) as follows: grade 0: no immunoreactivity, grade 1: if any specific staining, slightly stronger than background staining was detected, and grade 2: if clear immunoreactivity in more than half of the cancer cells were detected.
Similar(55)
At this concentration, no non-specific background staining was detectable.
Some background TUNEL staining was detected in HepG2 cells possibly due to the endogenous peroxidase activity.
No background staining was detectable in mammary tissue when lacZ staining was performed.
No significant staining was detected in slides incubated with control rabbit serum and/or mouse IgG instead of the primary antibody indicating the absence of significant background staining.
No membranous staining was detected.
No nuclear staining was detected.
Related(20)
background staining was determined
background staining was eliminated
background staining was adjusted
background noise was detected
background staining was evaluated
background staining was achieved
background staining was examined
background signal was detected
background staining was judged
background expression was detected
background fluorescence was detected
background selection was detected
background staining was produced
background staining was performed
background value was detected
background staining was assessed
background staining was measured
background immunoreactivity was detected
background staining was done
background autofluorescence was detected
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com