was validated through

USAGE SUMMARY

'was validated through' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to describe a process in which the accuracy or validity of something was tested or confirmed. For example, "The results of the experiment were validated through further analysis."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The instrument was validated through face validity, content validity and inter-rater reliability.

Conflict and Health

The model was validated through cross-validation.

Critical Care

The accuracy of the numerical method was validated through verification and validation studies.

Ocean Engineering

The program was validated through several aspects.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

The ontology was validated through application to other meeting situations.

Expert Systems with Applications

The model was validated through comparisons with previously published studies.

Tribology International

This linkage was validated through gene deletion experiments.

Metabolic Engineering

The goodness of data was validated through ANOVA.

Measurement

The integrated model was validated through 75 images.

Automation in Construction

The proposed surface treatment was validated through a laboratory experiment.

Construction and Building Materials

The methodology was validated through comparison with tension tests.

Composites Part B: Engineering

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was validated through", ensure you clearly specify the method or data used for validation immediately following the phrase. This provides clarity and strengthens the credibility of your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "was validated through" without specifying the validation method. Saying something "was validated through analysis" is less effective than saying it "was validated through statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA)".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was validated through" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject's accuracy or truthfulness has been confirmed. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is both grammatically correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was validated through" is a common and grammatically sound way to express that something has been confirmed or proven using a specific method. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is suitable for formal and scientific writing, where precision is key. To effectively use this phrase, always clearly specify the method of validation. Remember, replacing it with alternatives like "was confirmed by means of" or "was verified using" can add nuance to your writing. By following these guidelines, you can confidently and clearly communicate the validation process in your work.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was confirmed by means of

Emphasizes the method or instrument used in the confirmation process.

was verified using

Highlights the tools or techniques employed to verify the claim.

was substantiated by

Focuses on the evidence that supports the validation.

was corroborated with

Indicates that the validation involved comparing different sources to find agreement.

was proven via

Stresses the method through which proof was established.

was demonstrated via

Indicates that validation occurred by showing or illustrating its truth.

was assessed through

Focuses on the evaluation methods used to ensure accuracy.

was checked by

Suggests a review or inspection process to confirm accuracy.

was tested with

Highlights the use of experimental methods to validate the results.

was supported by

Indicates that data or evidence provided backing for the validation.

FAQs

How can I use "was validated through" in a sentence?

You can use "was validated through" to indicate the process or method by which something was confirmed to be true or accurate. For instance, "The hypothesis "was validated through" rigorous experimentation".

What are some alternatives to "was validated through"?

Alternatives include phrases such as "was confirmed by means of", "was verified using", or "was substantiated by", which all convey a similar meaning of confirmation or verification.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was validated through"?

While "was validated through" is in the passive voice, it is grammatically correct and commonly used, particularly in scientific writing where the emphasis is on the method rather than the actor. Using the active voice might require rephrasing, such as "Researchers validated the model through...".

What's the difference between "was validated through" and "was verified by"?

"Was validated through" and "was verified by" are very similar. "Validated" often implies a more comprehensive assessment of correctness, while "verified" suggests a check against a known standard or specification. However, in many contexts, they are used interchangeably.