was verified using

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was verified using" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a method or process by which something was confirmed or validated. Example: "The results of the experiment were verified using statistical analysis to ensure accuracy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This was verified using Nessler's reagent.

Environmental Systems Research

This method was verified using coupled simulations.

Journal of Fluids and Structures

The failure mode was verified using a stereomicroscope.

Applied Adhesion Science

Developed model was verified using Ngspice [146] as a macrocircuit.

Nanoscale Research Letters

Finally, this control system was verified using a VR simulator.

ROBOMECH Journal

Ischemic myocardial injury was verified using ECG monitoring.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Protein identity was verified using MALDI TOF mass spectrometry.

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics

The model was verified using pilot-scale gas transfer experiments.

Water Research

The predicted process behaviour was verified using the simulation model.

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Trypsin activity was verified using a synthetic substrate.

Enzyme and Microbial Technology

The investigation was verified using existing analytical models.

Thin-Walled Structures

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was verified using", ensure that the method of verification is clearly stated to provide context and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "was verified using" without specifying the tool, method, or data that enabled the verification. Lack of specificity weakens the claim.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was verified using" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject has been confirmed or validated through a specific method. This construction is commonly used to emphasize the process of verification and the tool or technique employed.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was verified using" is a grammatically correct and highly prevalent expression, particularly within scientific literature. As supported by Ludwig, it serves to denote that a subject has been confirmed or validated through a clearly defined methodology. To ensure effective communication, it is important to always specify the instrument, the method or the data to remove vagueness and add validity. While alternatives like "was confirmed via" or "was validated with" exist, they may not always convey the same level of technical rigor. This phrase is deemed correct and usable in written English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was confirmed via

Indicates confirmation through a specific method.

was validated with

Suggests validation using a particular tool or technique.

was authenticated by means of

Implies a formal authentication process using a specific method.

was substantiated through

Emphasizes the provision of evidence to support a claim.

was checked by

A more general way of saying something was checked.

was corroborated with

Suggests that a finding was supported by additional evidence.

evidence supported

Focuses on the supporting nature of the evidence, rather than the act of verification.

confirmation came through

Highlights the arrival of confirmation through a specific channel or method.

findings aligned with

Emphasizes the alignment of findings with a particular method or standard.

results supported by

The results were backed up by a particular method.

FAQs

How can I use "was verified using" in a sentence?

The phrase "was verified using" indicates that something has been confirmed or validated by a specific method. For example: "The hypothesis "was verified using" statistical analysis."

What are some alternatives to "was verified using"?

Alternatives include phrases like "was confirmed via", "was validated with", or "was authenticated by means of", depending on the context.

Is it always necessary to specify the method when using "was verified using"?

Yes, it's best practice to specify the method of verification to enhance clarity and credibility. Saying "it "was verified using" established protocols" is more informative than simply saying "it was verified".

What is the difference between "was verified using" and "was confirmed using"?

While similar, "was verified using" often implies a more rigorous or technical process of validation, whereas "was confirmed using" can be used more broadly for any type of confirmation.