was verified by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was verified by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you need to indicate proof or confirmation of something. For example: "The authenticity of the document was verified by an independent third-party auditor."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Fox's call was verified by history.

The Guardian

Optimum condition selected was verified by experimental.

Applied Water Science

The plant material was verified by D.Sc.

Nanoscale Research Letters

Leutz's score was verified by Twin Galaxies.

Wikipedia

was verified by DNA sequencing.

Plosone

Removal was verified by PCR.

Plosone

Loading was verified by Ponceau Red staining.

Plosone

RNA quality was verified by Agilent Bioanalyzer.

Plosone

Construct integrity was verified by sequencing.

Plosone

Ube3a imprinting was verified by Pyrosequencing.

Plosone

Purity was verified by argentation TLC.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "was verified by", clearly identify the entity or method that performed the verification to add credibility and transparency to your statement.

Common error

Avoid overuse of passive constructions like "was verified by" if an active voice would make your writing more direct and engaging. Consider rewriting the sentence to highlight the verifier's action: "The auditor verified the documents" instead of "The documents were verified by the auditor."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was verified by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that an action (verification) was performed on a subject by a specific agent. This construction shifts the focus from the actor to the recipient of the action. Ludwig AI confirms the grammatical correctness and usability of this phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

88%

News & Media

3%

Wiki

1%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was verified by" serves to validate information by indicating its confirmation through a specified source or method. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically sound and widely applicable. It is most frequently encountered in scientific contexts, though its use extends to news media. When employing "was verified by", it is advisable to clearly state the source of verification to enhance credibility. Consider using the active voice for more direct communication. Common alternatives include "was confirmed by" and "was validated by". As such, understanding its function aids in both effective writing and critical evaluation of information.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was confirmed by

Replaces 'verified' with 'confirmed', suggesting a slightly stronger level of assurance.

was authenticated by

Substitutes 'verified' with 'authenticated', implying that something's genuineness was established.

was validated by

Replaces 'verified' with 'validated', indicating formal establishment of correctness.

was substantiated by

Uses 'substantiated' instead of 'verified', suggesting that evidence supported the original claim.

was corroborated by

Employs 'corroborated' in place of 'verified', highlighting that additional sources affirmed the information.

was checked by

Replaces 'verified' with 'checked', implying a simpler examination process.

was certified by

Uses 'certified' instead of 'verified', suggesting a formal endorsement or guarantee.

was ratified by

Substitutes 'verified' with 'ratified', implying formal approval or sanction.

was proven by

Replaces 'verified' with 'proven', indicating a demonstration of truth through evidence.

was affirmed by

Uses 'affirmed' instead of 'verified', suggesting a declaration of truth or validity.

FAQs

How can I use "was verified by" in a sentence?

Use "was verified by" to indicate that a claim or fact has been confirmed or proven by a specific entity or method. For example: "The data integrity "was verified by" an independent audit."

What are some alternatives to "was verified by"?

You can use alternatives like "was confirmed by", "was authenticated by", or "was validated by" depending on the context and the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was verified by"?

While "was verified by" is grammatically correct, using the active voice can often make your writing more direct and engaging. Consider rephrasing to emphasize the verifier's action: "The researchers verified the results" instead of "The results "was verified by" the researchers."

What does it mean when something "was verified by" an expert?

When something "was verified by" an expert, it means that a person with specialized knowledge and experience in a particular field has confirmed the accuracy, validity, or truth of that thing. This adds credibility and weight to the information.