was validated by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was validated by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something has been confirmed or supported by a particular source or authority. Example: "The findings of the study were validated by several experts in the field."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Then, it was validated by both internal and external validations.

IATSS Research

The decision was validated by the Australian supreme court.

The Guardian - Opinion

Our result was validated by simulations.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

This model was validated by the experiments.

Energy Procedia

The model was validated by experimental results.

Journal of Hazardous Materials

The model was validated by experimental data.

Applied Thermal Engineering

The model was validated by ANOVA, Table 3.

Chemistry Central Journal

The model was validated by using relative operating characteristic technique.

Applied Water Science

The model was validated by analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Chemistry Central Journal

Robustness was validated by slightly varying the chromatographic conditions.

Chemistry Central Journal

The method was validated by analyzing certified reference material.

Chemistry Central Journal

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was validated by", ensure that the source of validation is clearly identified and credible. This strengthens your argument and adds authority to your statement.

Common error

While "was validated by" is grammatically sound, overuse of passive voice can make your writing sound weak. Consider using active voice where appropriate, such as "Experiments validated the model" to create a more direct and engaging sentence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was validated by" functions as a passive construction indicating that something has been confirmed or proven correct by a particular method, source, or authority. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a correct and usable phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

89%

News & Media

5%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was validated by" is a grammatically correct and very common passive construction used to indicate confirmation or proof through a specific source or method. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its primary function is to lend credibility by referencing the validating entity. It is particularly prevalent in scientific and academic writing, signaling a formal and rigorous tone. When using this phrase, ensure you clearly identify the source providing the validation. While acceptable, consider using active voice for a more direct writing style.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was confirmed by

Replaces "validated" with a more direct synonym.

was verified by

Similar to "confirmed", implying a check for accuracy.

was supported by

Indicates backing or evidence in favor of something.

was corroborated by

Suggests that additional evidence strengthens the original finding.

was substantiated by

Implies proof or concrete evidence.

was authenticated by

Focuses on establishing genuineness or legitimacy.

was ratified by

Suggests formal approval or agreement.

evidence validates

Active voice construction, emphasizing the role of evidence.

data supports

Emphasizes the data's role in providing validation.

results confirm

Focuses on the confirming aspect of results.

FAQs

How can I use "was validated by" in a sentence?

Use "was validated by" to indicate that something has been confirmed or proven correct by a specific source or method. For example, "The model "was validated by" experimental data."

What are some alternatives to saying "was validated by"?

You can use alternatives such as "was confirmed by", "was verified by", or "was supported by" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "validate"?

While "was validated by" is grammatically correct (passive voice), using the active voice (e.g., "The experiment validated the hypothesis") can often make your writing more direct and impactful.

What does "validated" mean in a scientific context?

In a scientific context, "validated" means that a theory, method, or model has been tested and shown to be accurate or reliable through experimentation, observation, or comparison with established standards.