was supported by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was supported by" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when referring to the actions of someone or something providing assistance to another person or thing. For example, "The charity drive was supported by local businesses."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science & Research

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Ewing was supported by his superior, Maj.

The New York Times

It was supported by seemingly ingenious structures.

The Economist

Y.Z. was supported by NIH1R01HL107376.

Nature

G.L.C. was supported by IUNI.

Nature

This work was supported by Boeing.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Which was supported by the recent research?

University of California, Berkeley

CH was supported by the Ecole Polytechnique.

Harvard University

Trivedi was supported by NSF (grant DMR1309461).

Princeton University

The work was supported by NASA.

University of California, Berkeley

Heibner was supported by prominent figures.

The Guardian

Mr. Bustamante was supported by 18percentt.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was supported by", ensure the subject receiving support and the entity providing it are clearly identified to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid vague statements; specify who or what provided the support. Instead of saying "The project was supported by many", specify "The project was supported by local businesses and community volunteers".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was supported by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject received assistance, funding, or approval from an external source. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science & Research

52%

News & Media

28%

Academia

16%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was supported by" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed passive construction used to denote that a subject received assistance, funding, or endorsement from another source. According to Ludwig, this phrase is appropriate for use in written English. Its usage is particularly prevalent in scientific research, news media, and academic writing. When employing this phrase, it's crucial to clearly identify both the recipient and the provider of support to avoid ambiguity. Common alternatives include "was backed by", "was funded by", and "was aided by", each carrying slightly different nuances. While the phrase is versatile, clarity and precision in identifying the source of support are key to effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was backed by

Emphasizes active endorsement or financial backing.

was funded by

Focuses specifically on financial assistance provided.

was aided by

Highlights the assistance received, often in overcoming a challenge.

was endorsed by

Stresses a public declaration of approval and support.

was championed by

Indicates active and enthusiastic support from an advocate.

was sustained by

Focuses on ongoing support that allows something to continue.

was upheld by

Suggests maintenance and defense of a principle or decision.

was assisted by

Highlights the help received, often in a practical or logistical sense.

was facilitated by

Emphasizes the ease of progress due to the support received.

was promoted by

Focuses on active efforts to increase awareness or adoption.

FAQs

How can I use "was supported by" in a sentence?

Use "was supported by" to indicate that someone or something received assistance, funding, or approval from another entity. For instance, "The research "was supported by" a grant from the NIH".

What are some alternatives to "was supported by"?

You can use alternatives like "was backed by", "was funded by", or "was aided by" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "was support by" instead of "was supported by"?

No, "was support by" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrasing is ""was supported by"", which uses the past participle of the verb "support".

What's the difference between "was supported by" and "was helped by"?

While both phrases indicate assistance, ""was supported by"" often implies a more formal or official endorsement or provision of resources, while "was helped by" suggests a more general form of assistance.