was confirmed by

USAGE SUMMARY

'was confirmed by' is a perfectly grammatical and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when talking about something that is supported, proven, or verified. For example: "His identity as the murderer was confirmed by his own confession."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That was confirmed by Ecclestone.

The New York Times

His death was confirmed by NASA.

The New York Times

His death was confirmed by his office.

The New York Times

His death was confirmed by his family.

The New York Times - Sports

Mr. Gandolfini's death was confirmed by HBO.

The New York Times - Arts

Her death was confirmed by the university.

The New York Times

This was confirmed by mail.

The New York Times - Travel

The goal was confirmed by video review.

The New York Times - Sports

This agreement was confirmed by two meetings.

The Guardian - Sport

This was confirmed by the PPO investigators.

The Guardian

Neither case was confirmed by laboratory testing.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was confirmed by" to build trust and credibility in your writing by highlighting the validation of your claims.

Common error

Avoid overuse of the passive voice (e.g., "was confirmed by") which can make your writing sound less direct and engaging. Consider active voice constructions where appropriate to improve clarity and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was confirmed by" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a piece of information or a statement has been verified or validated by a specific source. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is common and grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was confirmed by" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase to indicate that information has been verified by a source. As Ludwig AI highlights, it is common in both news and scientific contexts, lending credibility and authority to the statement. While it is a passive construction, it's useful for emphasizing the validation of information. Consider using active voice for directness when appropriate. When using this phrase, ensure the source of confirmation is credible and relevant to the information being presented to maintain the integrity of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was verified by

Emphasizes that something was checked and found to be true, implying a more direct form of validation.

was validated by

Highlights the process of establishing the truth or accuracy of something through formal methods or criteria.

was substantiated by

Indicates that something was supported or proven with evidence, often in a more formal or legal context.

was corroborated by

Suggests that something was supported by additional sources or evidence, enhancing its credibility.

was proven by

Asserts that something was demonstrated to be true through conclusive evidence or argument.

was supported by

Indicates that something received backing or affirmation from evidence or sources.

evidence indicates

Focuses on the evidence itself, rather than the act of confirmation, to suggest a particular conclusion.

findings suggest

Highlights that the results of an investigation or study point towards a specific conclusion.

research demonstrates

Emphasizes that a particular study or investigation has clearly shown or proven something.

data implies

Indicates that the available data suggests a particular conclusion, without explicitly stating it as confirmed.

FAQs

How can I use "was confirmed by" in a sentence?

Use "was confirmed by" to indicate that something has been verified or validated by a specific source. For example, "The study's findings were confirmed by additional research."

What are some alternatives to "was confirmed by"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "was verified by", "was validated by", or "was substantiated by".

Is it better to use active or passive voice when saying something "was confirmed by" a source?

While "was confirmed by" (passive voice) is grammatically correct, using active voice can sometimes make your writing more direct and engaging. For example, instead of "The results were confirmed by the study", you could say "The study confirmed the results."

What does it mean when something "was confirmed by" an expert?

When something "was confirmed by" an expert, it means that a knowledgeable and authoritative figure in a particular field has verified or validated the information, lending credibility to the statement.