was funded with

USAGE SUMMARY

"was funded with" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something was provided with money. For example: "The school renovation project was funded with donations from local businesses."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That company "was funded with several million dollars and it failed miserably," Mr. Steiner said.

The New York Times

The project was funded with donations from more than 40 governments.

The Guardian

The loan was funded with stimulus money and formally announced in September 2009.

The Washington Post

The IIC was funded with support from Google.org; The Joyce Foundation; and Joseph Eastin and ISN®.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The study was funded with support from the National Science Foundation.

Stanford University

The majority of the purchase price was funded with cash on the balance sheet at Summit.

The New York Times

Prison officials emphasize that involvement is voluntary and that the production was funded with donations from individuals and charitable groups.

The New York Times

The East End-born billionaire currency magnate's advisers were at pains to point out this week that his investment in Bear Stearns was funded with cash.

The Guardian - Business

Not only was the £12.2bn deal the first private equity purchase of a FTSE 100 company, but it was funded with an alarming £9bn of debt.

The Guardian - Business

The deal was funded with a healthy 40percentt equity stake, and Gale and Vornado were looking for $400 million in financing.

The New York Times

Taina F Cardoso was funded with a fellowship from the CAPES Foundation-Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education, Ministry of Education MECC) of the Federal Government of Brazil.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was funded with", clearly state the source of the funding to provide context and transparency.

Common error

Avoid using "was funded with" without specifying what the funding was used for. For example, instead of "The project was funded with grants", specify "The project was funded with grants from the National Science Foundation."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was funded with" functions as a passive construction indicating the source of financial resources used to support a project, study, or organization. This is evident from the examples provided by Ludwig, which showcase the phrase's ability to specify the type of financial support.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was funded with" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe the financial backing of a project, study, or organization. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's used to specify the source of the funds. Analysis of usage patterns shows that it appears most frequently in news articles, scientific publications, and academic papers. When using "was funded with", it is best practice to clearly identify the funding source to provide context. Common errors include omitting what exactly the funds were provided for. Related phrases like "was financed by" and "received funding from" offer similar meanings, allowing for varied expression. In summary, "was funded with" is a versatile and valuable tool for communicating financial information clearly and effectively.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was financed by

Focuses on the financial aspect, indicating who provided the funding.

received funding from

Highlights the act of receiving funds from a source.

was supported by

Emphasizes the supportive role of the funding source.

was granted funds by

Indicates a formal allocation of funds.

was backed by

Suggests a stronger endorsement and financial commitment.

was capitalized by

Focuses on providing capital for a venture.

was endowed with

Implies a long-term, often philanthropic funding source.

was resourced by

Broadly covers the provision of resources, not just financial.

benefited from funding by

Highlights the positive impact of the funding.

obtained funding through

Focuses on the process of acquiring funding.

FAQs

How can I use "was funded with" in a sentence?

Use "was funded with" to indicate the source of financial support for a project, study, or organization. For example, "The research "was funded with" a grant from the NIH."

What are some alternatives to saying "was funded with"?

Alternatives include "was financed by", "received funding from", or "was supported by", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "was funded with" or "was funded by"?

"Was funded with" specifies what the funding consisted of (e.g., grants, donations), while "was funded by" indicates the source of the funding. The choice depends on which aspect you want to emphasize. For example, research "was funded with" taxpayer dollars, but "was funded by" NASA.

What is the difference between "was funded with" and "was founded with"?

"Was funded with" refers to the financial resources that supported something, while "was founded with" refers to the initial resources or principles used to establish something. For example, "The project "was funded with" a grant", but "The organization "was founded with" the goal of promoting education".