was funded by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was funded by" is correct and usable in written English.
You would use this phrase when you want to indicate that something was provided with money or resources by a certain entity. For example: The renovation of the library was funded by the city council.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

(The project was funded by a Kickstarter).

The New York Times

None was funded by industry.

The Guardian

It was funded by the film industry.

The Guardian

It was funded by the C.I.A.

The New Yorker

Mr. Wark's study was funded by NOAA.

The New York Times

Adaptive was funded by NET in 1988.

Forbes

The fellowship was funded by the American Lung Association ALAAmerican Lung Association ALA

Science Magazine

The study was funded by Mzumbe University.

Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research

The work was funded by RSR Ltd.

Autoimmunity Highlights

This study was funded by AstraZeneca.

Health Economics Review

It was funded by the authors.

Progress in Orthodontics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was funded by", clearly state the funding source to ensure transparency and avoid ambiguity. For example, specify whether a project "was funded by" a government agency, a private foundation, or individual donors.

Common error

Avoid vague statements about funding. Instead of saying, "The research was funded," specify "The research was funded by the National Science Foundation" to provide clarity and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was funded by" functions as a passive construction indicating the source of financial support for a particular entity, project, or activity. Ludwig confirms this, providing numerous examples where this phrase is used to attribute funding to various organizations.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

53%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was funded by" is a common and grammatically correct way to indicate the source of financial support. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's frequently used in academic, scientific, news, and business contexts to provide transparency and attribute funding to specific organizations or individuals. When using this phrase, ensure you clearly identify the funding source to maintain clarity and credibility. While alternatives like "was financed by" or "received funding from" exist, "was funded by" remains a direct and effective choice for most formal writing situations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was financed by

Emphasizes the financial aspect of the support.

received funding from

Highlights the act of receiving funds, changing the sentence structure.

was supported by a grant from

Specifies the form of funding as a grant, adding detail.

was sponsored by

Suggests a more promotional or endorsement-based relationship.

obtained resources from

Broader term encompassing more than just financial resources.

was bankrolled by

Informal term implying substantial financial backing.

was underwritten by

Often used in the context of insurance or financial guarantees.

was endowed by

Suggests a permanent source of funding, often from a large donation.

benefited from the generosity of

Highlights the charitable aspect of the funding source.

drew financial backing from

Emphasizes the action of obtaining financial support.

FAQs

How can I use "was funded by" in a sentence?

Use "was funded by" to indicate the source of financial support for a project, study, or organization. For instance, "The study "was funded by" the National Institutes of Health".

What are some alternatives to "was funded by"?

Alternatives include "was financed by", "received funding from", or "was supported by". The best choice depends on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it acceptable to use "was funded by" in formal writing?

Yes, "was funded by" is perfectly acceptable in formal writing, especially in academic papers, reports, and grant proposals. It clearly and concisely indicates the origin of financial support.

What information should I include when using "was funded by"?

Always specify the exact name of the funding organization or individual. Avoid vague language. For example, instead of saying "The project was funded by a private donor," state "The project "was funded by" the John Smith Foundation".