was financed by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was financed by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the source of funding for a project, event, or initiative. Example: "The new community center was financed by a generous donation from a local business."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Much of it was financed by debt.

The Economist

It was financed by the National Institutes of Health.

The New York Times - Health

The trial was financed by the National Institutes of Health.

The New York Times

The study was financed by Eli Lilly.

The New York Times

Some said it was financed by pornographers.

The New York Times

It was financed by an anonymous donor.

The New York Times

Its March 2010 report was financed by the Energy Department.

The New York Times

Most of the increase was financed by four bond issues.

Encyclopedia Britannica

His study was financed by CareFusion, which makes both products.

The New York Times - Health

The work was financed by millions of ordinary ratepayers.

The New York Times - Tech

Much of Parmalat's debt mountain was financed by international banks.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was financed by", ensure clarity regarding the specific entity or source providing the funding to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid vaguely attributing financial support. Instead of saying "the project was financed by unnamed sources", be specific: "the project was financed by a grant from the National Science Foundation."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was financed by" functions as a passive construction indicating the source of funding for a particular entity, project, or activity. As Ludwig AI shows, this phrase is commonly used in various contexts to specify where financial resources originated.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

45%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Social Media

1%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was financed by" is a grammatically correct and commonly used passive construction to indicate the source of funding for a project, study, or organization. Ludwig AI confirms its usability across various contexts. While "was funded by" and "was supported by" serve as direct alternatives, choosing the most appropriate phrase depends on the specific nuance you intend to convey. When using "was financed by", clarity is key; be specific about the funding source to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was funded by

Replaces 'financed' with 'funded', a direct synonym, maintaining the same passive voice and meaning.

was supported through

Uses 'supported' instead of 'financed', broadening the scope to include non-monetary support.

received funding from

Shifts from passive to active voice, emphasizing the recipient of the funding.

was underwritten by

Suggests a more formal or contractual agreement of financial backing.

was bankrolled by

Implies significant financial investment and control by the funding entity.

was subsidized by

Indicates partial financial assistance, often from a government or organization.

was sponsored by

Suggests a commercial or promotional relationship with the funding source.

obtained investment from

Highlights the act of gaining financial backing from investors.

was capitalized by

Focuses on the initial provision of capital for a venture or enterprise.

was endowed by

Implicates long-term, consistent funding, often from a dedicated fund or foundation.

FAQs

How can I use "was financed by" in a sentence?

Use "was financed by" to indicate the entity that provided the funds for a particular project, study, or venture. For example, "The research "was financed by" the National Institutes of Health."

What are some alternatives to "was financed by"?

You can use phrases like "was funded by", "was supported by", or "received funding from" as alternatives to "was financed by", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing how something was funded?

Both active and passive voice can be used. "The project "was financed by" the city council" (passive) emphasizes the project. "The city council financed the project" (active) emphasizes the city council.

What's the difference between "was financed by" and "was sponsored by"?

"Was financed by" generally refers to the direct provision of funds. "Was sponsored by" often implies a broader relationship, where the sponsor might also provide resources, endorsements, or promotional support, in addition to funding.