was ascertained with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was ascertained with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something was determined or established through a specific method or means. Example: "The results of the experiment were ascertained with the help of advanced statistical analysis."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

50 human-written examples

Additionally, the diagnosis of ASD was ascertained with the SCID [21].

Annals of Intensive Care

The reduction of substrate was ascertained with XRD, FTIR and XPS analysis.

Separation and Purification Technology

Additionally, the diagnosis of PTSD was ascertained with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) [21] in CCI patients.

Annals of Intensive Care

The sample size was 22. Dentin sensitivity was ascertained with an accurate cold testing device that slowly decreased in temperature.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

The hydrolysis was performed with dilute H2SO4 at 90 °C and the influence of acid concentration (0.1 0.3 M) and reaction time (20 40 min) on the XOS production was ascertained with response surface methodology based on central composite design.

Food Chemistry

Ultrasound-assisted alkaline pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse (SCB) for fermentable sugar production was carried out and the influence of particle size, liquid to solid ratio (LSR), NaOH concentration, temperature and sonication time on delignification and reducing sugar production was ascertained with Placket Burman design.

Bioresource Technology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

10 human-written examples

Assuming further that missense mutations and nonsense mutations are ascertained with an equal probability, the ascertainment depth of missense mutations is Sn/ Tn.

Genome Biology and Evolution

These voters should not be disfranchised where their intent may be ascertained with reasonable certainty, simply because the chad they punched did not completely dislodge from the ballot.

The New York Times

Our courts have repeatedly held that, where the intention of the voter can be ascertained with reasonable certainty from his ballot, that intention will be given effect even though the ballot is not strictly in conformity with the law...

The New York Times

It is that contrary to what you may have gleaned from the literary deconstructionists, there is a truth, and if it can't be ascertained with total assurance, it can certainly be closely approached, like the calculus approaching the curve.

The New York Times - Books

It hinted broadly that dimpled chads should be counted, quoting an Illinois Supreme Court opinion declaring that "voters should not be disfranchised where their intent may be ascertained with reasonable certainty".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was ascertained with", ensure that the method or tool used for ascertainment is clearly specified to maintain clarity and precision in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "was ascertained with" without explicitly stating what "it" refers to. Ensure the subject being ascertained is clear to prevent ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was ascertained with" functions as a passive construction indicating how a determination or confirmation was made. It specifies the means by which something was established or verified, providing clarity and precision.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

98%

News & Media

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was ascertained with" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression, particularly in scientific and formal writing. As Ludwig AI confirms, it serves to specify the method or tool used to determine or confirm something. While alternatives like "was determined by" or "was established through" exist, "was ascertained with" maintains a formal tone suitable for academic and technical contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure the method of ascertainment is clearly stated to avoid ambiguity. Its prevalence in scientific literature underscores its value in precise and informative communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was determined by

This alternative uses a more direct verb and implies a clear cause-and-effect relationship.

was established through

This phrase emphasizes the process or means by which something was confirmed.

was confirmed using

This alternative highlights the use of a particular method or instrument for confirmation.

was verified via

This option underscores the act of checking or proving the truth of something.

was validated by means of

This phrase stresses the formal or official confirmation of something using a specific approach.

was assessed with the aid of

This emphasizes assistance during the evaluation process, like a tool.

was measured through

This highlights the quantitative aspect of the ascertainment.

was identified via

This suggests a process of discovery or recognition.

was found using

This indicates the discovery was directly related to the method employed.

was concluded based on

This suggests the method or result was the basis for a final judgment or decision.

FAQs

How can I use "was ascertained with" in a sentence?

The phrase "was ascertained with" is used to indicate that something was determined or confirmed through a specific method or tool. For example: "The diagnosis of ASD "was ascertained with" the SCID." It is commonly used in scientific and formal writing.

What are some alternatives to "was ascertained with"?

Some alternatives include "was determined by", "was established through", or "was confirmed using", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing how something was ascertained?

While "was ascertained with" is in the passive voice, using the active voice can often make your writing more direct and concise. For example, instead of "The result was ascertained with the calorimeter", you could write "The calorimeter ascertained the result".

What's the difference between "was ascertained with" and "was assessed with"?

"Was ascertained with" implies a definitive determination or confirmation, whereas "was assessed with" suggests an evaluation or judgment. Ascertainment aims to establish something as fact, while assessment aims to evaluate its qualities or value.