was assessed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was assessed with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the method or tool used to evaluate or measure something in a study or assessment context. Example: "The patient's cognitive function was assessed with a standardized test to determine any impairments."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The model quality was assessed with MolProbity60.

Nature

Cellular ultrastructure was assessed with electron microscopy17.

Nature

Convergence was assessed with Tracer v1.684.

Nature

Convergence was assessed with the statistic48.

Nature

Reproducibility was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient.

Stanford University

Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach´s alpha.

Nature

Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots and Egger's test.

Nature

DNA concentration was assessed with PicoGreen (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Nature

Later, everyone's appetite was assessed with a questionnaire.

Harvard University

Reproducibility was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient.

Stanford University

PVR grade was assessed with echocardiography.

The American Journal of Cardiology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was assessed with", ensure the method or tool you are referencing is clearly defined and appropriate for the context. This improves clarity and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "was assessed with" if the method wasn't directly used for assessment. For example, don't say "the data was assessed with the conclusion" – the conclusion isn't the assessment tool.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was assessed with" functions as a passive construction indicating the method or instrument used to perform an evaluation. It clearly identifies the tool employed in the assessment process. Ludwig examples confirm its use in describing methodologies in scientific and academic contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

64%

Academia

34%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was assessed with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used construction, primarily in scientific and academic writing, to specify the method or tool used in an evaluation. Ludwig AI confirms this widespread usage. Alternatives such as "was evaluated using" or "was measured by" can be used depending on the context to express similar meanings. When using "was assessed with", ensure the method is clearly identified for clarity and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was evaluated using

Replaces "assessed" with "evaluated", emphasizing a judgment or determination of value.

was measured by

Focuses on quantitative measurement rather than a qualitative assessment.

was determined via

Highlights the means by which a conclusion or result was reached.

was examined through

Suggests a detailed inspection or investigation was conducted.

was analyzed with

Emphasizes the use of analytical techniques to understand something.

was investigated by means of

Indicates a formal inquiry or systematic examination using specific tools.

was gauged through

Implies a careful estimation or judgment of something's level or quantity.

was tested using

Focuses on the use of a test or experiment to evaluate performance or characteristics.

was checked via

Indicates a verification or confirmation process using a particular method.

was quantified by

Specifically refers to measuring or expressing something numerically.

FAQs

How can I use "was assessed with" in a sentence?

Use "was assessed with" to describe the method or tool used to evaluate something. For example, "The patient's cognitive function "was assessed with" a standardized test".

What are some alternatives to using "was assessed with"?

You can use alternatives like "was evaluated using", "was measured by", or "was determined via" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "was assessed with" or "was evaluated with"?

Both ""was assessed with"" and "was evaluated with" are correct, but "assessed" implies a more detailed and comprehensive examination, while "evaluated" suggests a judgment of worth or quality.

What's the difference between "was assessed with" and "was measured with"?

"Was assessed with" is used for both qualitative and quantitative evaluations, whereas "was measured with" refers specifically to quantitative determinations. You might say "performance "was assessed with" a rubric" but "length was measured with a ruler".