Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was confirmed using
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"was confirmed using" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used when you want to explain how something was shown to be true. For example, "The eyewitness's statement that the suspect was carrying a white bag was confirmed using video surveillance footage."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Following extraction, sample quality was confirmed using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, CA, US).
Science & Research
Endothelial phenotype was confirmed using in vitro assays.
Academia
Selenomethionine incorporation was confirmed using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
Science & Research
Data normality was confirmed using the Shapiro Wilk test.
Science & Research
This was confirmed using micrograph observations.
Science
This observation was confirmed using ellipsometry.
Science
The performance of the motors was confirmed using gliding filament assays and single fluorophore tracking.
Academia
The IMC layer was confirmed using transmission electron microscopy images.
Science
Validity of results (p-values) was confirmed using 1,000,000 bootstraps.
Science & Research
This observation was confirmed using thresholded Mander's colocalization analysis (Supplementary Fig. 3c).
Science & Research
Staining specificity was confirmed using fluorescence minus one (FMO, all antibodies minus one).
Science & Research
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was confirmed using", ensure that the method or tool used for confirmation is clearly specified. This enhances the credibility and clarity of your statement.
Common error
Avoid using "was confirmed using" without specifying what exactly confirmed the information. For example, instead of writing "The results were confirmed using analysis", specify the type of analysis: "The results were confirmed using mass spectrometry analysis."
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was confirmed using" serves as a passive construction that indicates the method or tool employed to verify or substantiate a particular finding or statement. Ludwig AI indicates that this is a grammatically correct and usable phrase.
Frequent in
Science
75%
Academia
15%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
News & Media
3%
Wiki
1%
Reference
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was confirmed using" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression, particularly in scientific and academic contexts, to indicate the method by which a statement or finding has been verified. Ludwig AI supports its validity. To maximize clarity, always specify the exact method or tool used for confirmation, avoiding vague language. While versatile, more formal alternatives like "was validated through" or "was substantiated by" can be considered depending on the context. By following these guidelines, writers can effectively communicate the reliability and credibility of their information.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was verified by means of
Replaces "using" with a more formal prepositional phrase; suggests a method of verification.
was validated through
Substitutes "confirmed" with "validated" and "using" with "through", emphasizing the validation process.
was substantiated by
Replaces "confirmed using" with "substantiated by", highlighting the support for a claim.
was demonstrated with the aid of
Emphasizes the demonstration of a fact with the assistance of something.
was corroborated via
Uses "corroborated" instead of "confirmed" and "via" instead of "using", implying additional support.
was supported by
A more general way of saying that something was backed up by evidence.
was proven through the application of
Highlights the proof and application of a method.
evidence for this came from
Shifts the focus to the evidence supporting the confirmation.
the data confirms
Expresses confirmation in a more direct and active voice.
analysis revealed
Indicates that analysis led to a confirming discovery.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "was confirmed using" to sound more formal?
To sound more formal, you can replace "was confirmed using" with alternatives like "was verified by means of", "was validated through", or "was substantiated by" depending on the context.
Is there a difference between "was confirmed using" and "was validated using"?
While both phrases suggest verification, "was validated using" often implies a more rigorous or formal process of establishing the truth or accuracy of something, whereas "was confirmed using" is a more general term.
Can I use "was confirmed using" in business writing?
Yes, "was confirmed using" is acceptable in business writing when you need to explain how data or information was verified. However, consider using stronger or more specific language depending on the context, such as "was verified by means of".
What are some common methods used to confirm a hypothesis, as in "was confirmed using"?
Common methods include experimental data, statistical analysis, simulations, or comparisons with existing literature. The specific method should always be clearly stated to enhance clarity and credibility.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested