Ai Feedback
Exact(4)
Among them are the following: assuming that the process is purely random, assuming that there was only one possible way for life to arise, and assuming that the first living things were as complex as, or shared the same biochemical features with, present living things.
When we take the interaction effect for heterogeneity (G.S.T) as random, assuming a constant variance for this effect, the chi-squared statistic for inconsistency (G.T) drops to 2.27.
Results are reported just for women returning for follow up (i.e. assuming that data were missing at random); assuming that women lost to follow up were treatment failures; and assuming that women lost to follow up were treatment successes.
The test for the necessity of random parameters, based on log likelihood improvement, resulted in the following parameters being set random, assuming a normal distribution: The effectiveness of the vaccine, the side effects of the vaccine and the source of information that the vaccine causes problems (both social media and acquaintance).
Similar(56)
We can estimate probability of false positives from probability of coincidence in three random trials, assuming zero hypothesis, i.e. assuming that the differences are purely random.
The BER performance is simulated using a Monte Carlo method with 100,000 random blocks, assuming a 16-QAM system.
Individual students were modeled as random effects, assuming a general correlation structure (i.e. unstructured within-student correlation).
On the other hand, the HB approach treats both the fixed effects and random effects parameters as random and assumes a joint distribution for these parameters.
Since, the pick-up mice for each experiment is random, we assume the loss of mice is completely random, the missing data issue does not consider.
We note that the random variable assumes the values from the set (2.20).
The error term is random and assumed to be constant variance and mean of zero.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com