Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
random guessing
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"random guessing" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe a guess (or guesses) that are not based on any logical reasoning or evidence. For example: "In order to figure out the correct answer, he resorted to random guessing."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
The average expert did only slightly better than random guessing.
News & Media
In comparison, random guessing on the exam's multiple-choice component yields an expected raw score of 15percentt.
News & Media
Instead, they identified the bird and fish names correctly 58percentt of the time, significantly more often than expected for random guessing.
News & Media
Since no points are deducted for leaving an answer blank, random guessing is not recommended on the PSAT/NMSQT, SAT or SAT subject tests.
News & Media
Perfect indistinguishability coincides with random guessing.
This performance is superior to random guessing, but poor compared to results achieved by computational techniques.
Science
(There's only 1 chance in 256 that random guessing could deliver such consistency).
News & Media
Of course, this rule will make predictions that are significantly better than random guessing.
Following is the comparison of the framework with a baseline random guessing and an exhaustive framework.
In the traditional AdaBoost algorithm, the learner is weak and just slightly better than random guessing.
They suggest estimating the performance of random guessing using a Monte Carlo scheme which unfortunately excludes some correct guesses.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "random guessing" to clearly convey the absence of reasoning or informed decision-making in situations where choices are made.
Common error
While "random guessing" is widely understood, avoid its overuse in formal or academic writing where more precise terms like "stochastic method" or "uninformed selection" might be more appropriate.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "random guessing" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often describing a method or approach that relies on chance rather than informed decision-making. Ludwig examples illustrate its use in contrasting informed predictions with those based on pure chance. The Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is grammatically correct and readily understood.
Frequent in
Science
61%
News & Media
32%
Formal & Business
7%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "random guessing" is a grammatically sound phrase used to depict scenarios where choices are made arbitrarily, lacking any reasoned basis. As Ludwig highlights, the phrase is commonly found in scientific and news contexts, serving as a benchmark to evaluate decision-making processes. While its neutral-to-formal tone makes it versatile, more specific alternatives might be apt in certain academic settings. Remember to use "random guessing" to denote the absence of informed decision-making, acknowledging its practical role in diverse communicative situations.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
chance selection
Emphasizes the selection process being based on chance.
arbitrary choice
Highlights the lack of a specific reason or system in making the choice.
haphazard selection
Stresses the lack of planning or organization in the selection.
indiscriminate selection
Highlights the absence of careful distinction or criteria.
pure guesswork
Focuses on the guessing aspect without any information or knowledge.
blind choice
Emphasizes the lack of awareness or information during the selection.
hit-or-miss approach
Highlights the uncertainty and low probability of success.
unsystematic selection
Focuses on the lack of a methodical approach in the selection process.
speculative selection
Emphasizes the speculative nature and lack of concrete evidence.
coin flip decision
Suggests a decision made by a random and binary event.
FAQs
How can I describe a situation where someone is making choices without any knowledge?
You can use the phrase "random guessing". It implies choices made without any reasoning or informed decision-making.
What is the difference between "random guessing" and speculation?
"Random guessing" implies a complete lack of knowledge, while speculation involves forming a theory or conjecture without firm evidence. Although both involve uncertainty, speculation usually has some basis, however weak, while "chance selection" is purely arbitrary.
When is it appropriate to use "random guessing" in academic writing?
"Random guessing" can be used to describe a baseline or control condition in experiments or simulations, especially when comparing against methods that incorporate some form of informed decision-making. It's often used in scientific contexts to compare if the results are better than "pure guesswork".
Are there more formal alternatives to "random guessing"?
Yes, in formal contexts, consider using terms like "arbitrary choice", "uninformed selection", or "stochastic method" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested