Sentence examples for methodological differences were from inspiring English sources

Other histopathology studies [ 23– 28], however, have failed to confirm these findings and suggest that methodological differences were responsible for the contradictory results, due to a different postmortem delay in axon count or difficulties in obtaining well-preserved myelinated axons.

Once methodological differences were controlled for, cross-study comparisons indicated that samples drawn exclusively from medical (including clinical and pharmacological) research reported misconduct more frequently than respondents in other fields or in mixed samples.

Methodological differences were found a) in the conditioning protocol (delay, trace), b) in the contingency rate (100 %, 80 %, 50or less) and awareness, c) in the modality of CS and US (tactile, auditory, visual, olfactory), and d) with respect to the further assessment of the conditioned response (e.g. psycho-physiological measurements, verbal ratings).

However, methodological differences were not significant in both subgroup analyses and meta-regression.

The most important methodological differences were that the study was carry out for a three years period, the authors do not included vertebral fractures [ 34].

If we compare the studies that did and did not find an association between depression and RTW post-MI, while no clear methodological differences were observed, failure to control for gender may have been a potential issue.

So the methodological differences are showing up in a big way this year.

Methodological differences are important in influencing the results of epidemiological studies in headache [7].

It is worth to mention that in this paper, there are several methodological differences, being the main of them that the effect of MEK/ERK inhibitors are tested after 24 and 48 hs of stimulation of rLHR4 granulosa cells with gonadotropin [31].

Methodological differences are also a likely factor.

In commenting on differences in major findings between MRI studies, methodological differences are often appealing candidates.