Sentence examples for methodological flaws were from inspiring English sources

Others disagreed, saying that if methodological flaws were found after testing, it could be too late to get crucial information or interpret the findings.

Methodological flaws were identified, which complicated interpretation and limited conclusions; hence, recommendations for future research are suggested.

Caution is urged when interpreting this finding as major methodological flaws were identified in previous evaluation studies, including: no control group; non-random group assignment; failure to control or measure confounding variables; and poor program design.

The most prevalent methodological flaws were shortcomings in randomization, treatment allocation, groups at baseline, and compliance.

Most frequent methodological flaws were high risk of selection and confounding bias.

The most frequent methodological flaws were the lack of a suitable control group, randomisation (including allocation concealment), and blinding of participants and those involved in the treatment.

Furthermore recurrent methodological flaws are encountered.

When results run counter to the researchers' expectations, methodological flaws are usually examined.

But when the results are in line with expectations, methodological flaws are more likely to be overlooked.

This will ensure that significant methodological flaws are not missed, and results of reviews are interpreted appropriately.

This is despite significant methodological flaws being identified in primary studies, such as small sample sizes, baseline differences between treatment and control groups, high drop-out rates, lack of assessor blinding, and intention to treat analyses [ 6, 7, 9].