Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
Each observed mating was considered as an event and the mating latency was the survival time.
If no litters were produced after 10 weeks the mating was considered non-productive.
Random mating was considered as well with ρ = 0.
The day of mating was considered GD 0. Glyphosate technical (purity: 96.8%) was formulated in 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose and Tween 80.
The day of mating was considered GD 0. Doses were described as mg/kg doses in the study report, but based on the dosing description it is assumed that these were daily doses.
Female New Zealand White rabbits (2.7 4.1 kg) of 17 19 weeks of age were mated with "stud" males by the supplier and delivered to the test facility at or before GD 3. The day of mating was considered GD 0. Glyphosate technical (purity: 95.3%) was formulated in 1% carboxymethyl cellulose, was stable over the test period and was shown to have an adequate homogeneity.
Similar(54)
Mating is considered as an indispensable physiological process in insects, and immunity is the basic aspect for individual survival.
Female breeders showing a vaginal plug on the day subsequent to mating were considered to be at day 0.5 of pregnancy.
Two mechanisms underlying assortative mating were considered: social homogamy and phenotypic assortment.
The day of the first mating is considered the first gestational day.
Our study reveals that the evolution of sexually dimorphic legs in Sepsidae can only be understood once the function of the legs during mating is considered and the relationships of species with and without sexual dimorphisms are known.
Related(20)
reproduction was considered
mate was considered
coupling was considered
love was considered
copulation was considered
docking was considered
mating was set
mating was pulled
mating was interrupted
mating was found
mating was performed
mating was conducted
mating was designed
mating was permitted
mating was induced
mating was defined
mating was simulated
mating was disallowed
mating was done
mating was compared
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com