Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
Error-checking of genotypes in the family material was performed with Merlin software (version 1.1.2; http://www.sph.umich.edu/csg/abecasis/merlin/index.html [20]) and families with one or more Mendelian discrepancies for a marker were excluded in the analysis of that markerLinkage and association between SNPs and PCOS was tested with the TDT [21].
Patients missing data for any immunohistochemical marker were excluded (n = 3).
Because of that, several SAMPLs, SNPs and one microsatellite marker were excluded.
Patients with inadequate samples to analyse for a particular marker were excluded from that specific statistical analysis.
Samples with missing data from more than one marker were excluded from data analysis to prevent low quality samples affecting genotype and haplotype distributions.
Cells co-expressing the reporter and this marker were excluded from the B-cell follicles, but were concentrated in T-cell-rich regions (Fig. 6L).
Similar(54)
Null alleles (alleles which failed to amplify reliably for a particular microsatellite, leading to errors in the final data) were estimated using the programme CERVUS 3.0.33333.One marker was excluded from subsequent analyses as it was associated with a high estimated proportion of null alleles.
One marker was excluded from the analysis due to a lack of linkage to its expected surrounding markers.
This marker was excluded from all analyses.
One patient for each marker was excluded owing to inconclusive staining.
LD blocks without neighboring markers within 300 kb of the focal marker are excluded from this figure.
Related(20)
indicator were excluded
marker were included
pen were excluded
trace were excluded
label were excluded
score were excluded
marker was excluded
marker were scaled
marker were normalized
marker were analyzed
marker were explored
marker were extracted
marker were dissolved
marker were considered
marker were measured
marker were positioned
marker were assembled
marker were maintained
marker were counted
marker were obtained
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com