Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
As isotype controls were not used, those cells that did not express a certain marker were considered as negative control for positive cells [55].
For the genetic variables, both dominant and recessive models for each genetic marker were considered.
SNPs up to +/-200kb on either side of the marker were considered.
Only the units (and not the sizes) from each marker were considered for the analysis.
Contigs that contained a genetic marker were considered anchored and assigned to a linkage group based upon that marker.
The high plasma levels of this marker were considered a sign of accelerated systemic fibrosis in ESRD patients with the worst prognosis.
Similar(50)
When resistance QTLs against a same pathogen species had overlapping confidence intervals on the integrated map, only one peak marker was considered.
Currently, no marker is considered to meet these criteria.
A marker was considered positive when more than 20% of the blasts showed a positive signal.
A purely predictive marker is considered to affect survival only in the presence of a treatment.
To avoid that the coding of the markers affected the imputation accuracy, every marker was considered twice.
More suggestions(15)
benchmarks were considered
marker were scaled
marker were normalized
marker were analyzed
marker were extracted
marker were dissolved
marker were measured
marker were positioned
marker were assembled
marker were maintained
marker were counted
marker were obtained
marker were wounded
marker were detected
marker were scored
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com