Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
Differences between subgroups were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Newman Keuls tests.
Differences between subgroups were analyzed with unpaired t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-square tests, as appropriate.
Differences between subgroups were analyzed by (paired) t tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for dichotomous variables.
Differences between subgroups were analyzed using Chi-square tests (or Fisher exact test if necessary) in the case of categorical variables.
Further differences between subgroups were analyzed using unpaired t-tests, and between-subjects ANOVAs in the case of more than two subgroups.
Differences between subgroups were analyzed using the test of subgroup differences described by Deeks et al. [ 13], and the results expressed using the P-values.
Similar(54)
The difference in allele and genotype frequencies between patients and healthy controls (as well as between different subgroups) were analyzed using χ-tests for 2 x 2 and 2 x 3 tables, respectively, with Fisher's exact test.
Differences in survival curves between the subgroups were analyzed using the log-rank test.
Mean change scores between the subgroups were analyzed with one-way ANOVA.
Methylation differences between tumor and normal samples and tumor subgroups were analyzed using a linear model in limma v3.2.1 [ 32].
The following diagnostic subgroups were analyzed: overall migraine, MA only, MA and MO, and MO only.
Related(20)
between subgroups were evaluated
between populations were analyzed
between subgroups were tested
between subgroups were investigated
between subgroups were analysed
between subgroups were assessed
between factors were analyzed
between subgroups were examined
between clusters were analyzed
between subgroups were considered
between subgroups were made
between subgroups were performed
between subgroups were found
between subgroups were corrected
between subgroups were adjusted
between variables were analyzed
between subgroups were identified
between strains were analyzed
between subgroups were calculated
between subgroups were addressed
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com