with a limit of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "with a limit of" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is used to describe a restriction or boundary on something. Example: "The company has implemented a new policy with a limit of three sick days per year."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

By then, Hughes had thrown 77 pitches, with a limit of 100.

The New York Times - Sports

Admission: $30 per person, with a limit of two dogs; proceeds benefit the organization.

The New York Times

There's also an optional fee-free credit card with a limit of £500.

The Guardian - Money

The president is elected directly to a four-year term, with a limit of two terms.

Britannica

Tickets must be purchased in person, with a limit of two per buyer.

The New York Times - Arts

(The safest is Class 1, with a limit of one milliwatt).

The New York Times - Health

Mr. Haider was going 88 miles per hour in a zone with a limit of 43 m.p.h.

The New York Times

Citizens can also hunt during that period, with a limit of five geese per hunter each day.

The New York Times

Internships may be granted for pay and/or credit with a limit of 3 credits maximum per internship.

Cornell University

ATCh quantification was achieved with a limit of detection (LOD) of 5.3×10−6 M.

Talanta

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Fit-for-purpose figures of merit were achieved with a limit-of-detection (LOD) of 3.06 pg/mL.

Biosensors and Bioelectronics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "with a limit of", ensure that the context clearly specifies what is being limited and the reason for the limitation. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "with a limit of" without specifying the units or context of the limitation. For example, instead of saying "The project has a limit", specify "The project has a limit of $10,000" or "The project has a time limit of three months."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with a limit of" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or noun phrase. It introduces a restriction or upper boundary on the quantity, amount, or extent of something, as confirmed by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

34%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Academia

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "with a limit of" is a commonly used and grammatically correct prepositional phrase that introduces a restriction or upper boundary. According to Ludwig, it's versatile across contexts, from specifying the maximum number of tickets per person to defining detection limits in scientific research. While it's suitable for neutral to formal communication, writers should ensure the context is clear and the limitation is well-defined to prevent ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

limited to

A shorter and more direct way of expressing the same restriction.

subject to a maximum of

Replaces "limit" with "maximum" and uses "subject to" to indicate a condition.

up to a maximum of

Indicates an upper boundary using "up to" to specify the maximum extent.

with a ceiling of

Replaces "limit" with "ceiling", implying an upper boundary.

restricted to

Focuses on the restriction aspect, omitting explicit mention of a "limit".

capped at

Uses the verb "capped" to describe setting an upper limit.

not exceeding

Specifies a value that cannot be surpassed.

constrained by

Highlights the constraint or restriction imposed.

under the restriction of

More formal and emphasizes the imposed restriction.

within the bounds of

Emphasizes staying within certain boundaries or limits.

FAQs

How can I use "with a limit of" in a sentence?

You can use "with a limit of" to specify a restriction or upper boundary, such as, "The number of participants is "limited to" 100", or "Each customer can purchase items "up to a maximum of" 5 per day".

What phrases are similar to "with a limit of"?

Similar phrases include "restricted to", "capped at", "not exceeding", and "limited to", which all express a similar concept of imposing a restriction.

Is it better to use "with a limit of" or "limited to"?

Both "with a limit of" and "limited to" are correct, but "limited to" is often more concise. The choice depends on the desired level of formality and emphasis in the sentence.

What's the difference between "with a limit of" and "with a minimum of"?

"With a limit of" indicates an upper boundary or restriction, while "with a minimum of" specifies a lower boundary or requirement. They are opposites; for example, "The class size is "with a limit of" 20 students" means no more than 20, whereas "The class requires "with a minimum of" 10 students" means at least 10 students are needed for the class to run.