with a minimum of

USAGE SUMMARY

'with a minimum of' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when the context calls for a description of doing something with the least effort or resources possible. For example: "I got the job done with a minimum of fuss and bother."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

51 human-written examples

Nadal holds his serve with a minimum of fuss.

The Guardian - Sport

All international crimes begin with a minimum of two years.

The Guardian

His rallies start and finish with a minimum of delay.

The Guardian

Roasting gets me there with a minimum of fuss.

The New York Times

A simple solution with a minimum of bureaucracy.

The Guardian

This, perhaps, is how he has always gone at things: headlong, with a minimum of introspection.

The Guardian - Film

Hopefully this can be accomplished with a minimum of melodrama and a maximum of substantive dialogue.

The Guardian

And if Lorenzo's transformation seems a little forced, it's conveyed with a minimum of melodrama.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

It'll be available for $229 with a minimum of 20 per store.

TechCrunch

Always use sunscreen with a minimum of SPF 15.

Huffington Post

"We'll start with a minimum of $5," she said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for brevity, consider if "with minimal" works in place of "with a minimum of". For example, "operate with minimal supervision".

Common error

Avoid using "minimum" alone to replace the entire phrase "with a minimum of" as it might not convey the intended meaning clearly. It's better to keep the preposition.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with a minimum of" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a verb or noun. It indicates that an action is performed or a condition is achieved using the smallest possible amount of something. Ludwig confirms its correct usage in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "with a minimum of" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to convey efficiency, reduction, or constraint. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and wide applicability across diverse contexts. As highlighted by examples from Ludwig, it effectively communicates that something is achieved using the least possible amount of a given resource or undesirable element. Remember to consider the context and choose the most fitting alternative when aiming for brevity or emphasizing specific aspects of the constraint. By adhering to best practices and avoiding common errors, you can effectively leverage this phrase in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

with minimal

Simplified version; omits 'a' for brevity.

with the least amount of

Rephrases with more emphasis on the quantity.

with a reduced

Highlights the act of lessening.

with limited

Focuses on the restriction.

requiring only

Focuses on the necessary amount.

needing just

Emphasizes simplicity in requirements.

at least

Indicates a lower bound.

using only

Highlights the exclusivity of usage.

demanding little

Focuses on the low level of demand.

involving hardly any

Emphasizes the small degree of involvement.

FAQs

How can I use "with a minimum of" in a sentence?

The phrase "with a minimum of" is used to indicate that something is done with the least possible amount of something else. For example, "He completed the project "with a minimum of fuss"".

What are some alternatives to "with a minimum of"?

Some alternatives include "with minimal", "with the least amount of", or "requiring only". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "with a minimum of errors" or "with minimal errors"?

Both "with a minimum of errors" and "with minimal errors" are correct. "With minimal errors" is slightly more concise, while "with a minimum of errors" provides a bit more emphasis on the reduction of errors. Choose the option that best fits the desired tone and style of your writing.

What's the difference between "with a minimum of" and "at least"?

"With a minimum of" indicates the lowest acceptable amount while minimizing something, whereas "at least" simply indicates a lower limit or threshold. For instance, "complete the task "with a minimum of effort"" versus "the task requires "at least two hours"".