were verified for

USAGE SUMMARY

"were verified for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when something is being checked to make sure it meets certain criteria. For example: "The documents were verified for accuracy before they were filed."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Superior barrier properties were verified for the paints with pigment content lower than 1.0 wt.%.

Progress in Organic Coatings

The known relations between the investigated process parameters were verified for the d.c.

Surface and Coatings Technology

Different aspects of the model were verified for two sheet metals, namely DP600 steel and AA6022 aluminum alloy.

International Journal of Solids and Structures

The newly prepared compounds were verified for their antimicrobial activities.

Chemistry Central Journal

All groups were verified for normal distribution before statistic calculations.

EJNMMI Research

All prepared compounds were verified for their antimicrobial activities.

Chemistry Central Journal

All data were verified for normal random distribution after transformation (arcsine).

AMB Express

All the components were verified for strength and stiffness using the measured pressure as input loads.

European Transport Research Review

The data were verified for normality of the measurements using histograms and Shapiro-Wilk tests.

Progress in Orthodontics

Thus methanol extracts obtained from the fruits of noni were verified for cytotoxic activity using different cancer cell lines.

Natural Products and Bioprospecting

These were verified for the first time at the accretionary prism toe and at the trough floor offshore of the Tokai region.

Earth, Planets and Space

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "were verified for" in formal writing to indicate that something has been checked and confirmed to meet specific criteria. This phrase is especially useful in scientific, technical, and legal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "were verified for" in casual conversation or informal writing. Simpler phrases like "were checked" or "were confirmed" are more appropriate for less formal settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were verified for" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject has undergone a process of validation or confirmation against specific criteria. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and frequently used. The examples show its application in confirming data accuracy, antimicrobial activities, and model specifications.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were verified for" is a grammatically correct and highly prevalent phrase, predominantly used in formal and scientific writing. As Ludwig AI has stated, it indicates that a subject has been checked and confirmed to meet specific criteria. This phrase is particularly useful when emphasizing the rigor and validation processes applied to data, results, or methodologies. While common in academic and technical domains, it should be used sparingly in informal contexts where simpler alternatives may be more appropriate. The phrase's strength lies in its ability to convey precision and assurance, making it indispensable in fields that prioritize accuracy and reliability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were validated for

Replaces "verified" with "validated", emphasizing the establishment of truth or accuracy.

were authenticated for

Substitutes "verified" with "authenticated", emphasizing the establishment of genuineness.

were confirmed for

Substitutes "verified" with "confirmed", highlighting the corroboration of information.

were substantiated for

Employs "substantiated" instead of "verified", highlighting the provision of evidence to support a claim.

were checked for

Uses "checked" instead of "verified", suggesting a simpler, more routine examination.

were assessed for

Employs "assessed" instead of "verified", implying an evaluation or judgment was made.

were examined for

Uses "examined" instead of "verified", suggesting a close and careful inspection.

were demonstrated for

Replaces "verified" with "demonstrated", focusing on the action of showing something clearly.

were tested for

Replaces "verified" with "tested", focusing on the process of subjecting something to a test.

were determined to have

Restructures the phrase to emphasize the outcome of the verification process.

FAQs

How is "were verified for" used in a sentence?

The phrase "were verified for" is used to indicate that something has been checked and confirmed to meet certain criteria. For instance, "The data "were verified for" accuracy before analysis."

What can I say instead of "were verified for"?

You can use alternatives like "were validated for", "were checked for", or "were confirmed for" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "were verified for" in writing?

It is best to use "were verified for" in formal or technical writing when you need to emphasize that a formal process of checking and confirmation has taken place. It is often found in scientific papers, legal documents, and technical reports.

What's the difference between "were verified for" and "were tested for"?

"Were verified for" implies a confirmation against a standard or requirement, whereas "were tested for" suggests a process of subjecting something to a test to determine its characteristics or performance. The former is about confirmation, the latter about evaluation.