Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were checked for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were checked for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something was examined or verified for a specific condition or item. Example: "The samples were checked for contamination before being analyzed in the lab."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The data distributions were checked for normality.

Science & Research

Nature

A range of focusses were checked for their standard deviation.

Model residuals were checked for normality and homogeneity of variances.

Science & Research

Nature

Duplicates were checked for reproducibility, and then averaged.

Science & Research

Nature

Themes were checked for differences as a function of group.

Science & Research

Nature

Mail deliveries were checked for account statements or bills.

News & Media

The New York Times

They were checked for symptoms for two weeks.

News & Media

The New York Times

The brick samples were checked for dimensions and visible defects.

The derived Schwann cells used were checked for fate commitment.

BVol% data were checked for outliers.

All survival models were checked for proportionality.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were checked for", ensure the context clearly specifies what is being examined and the criteria for assessment. This enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "were checked for" without specifying the purpose or criteria of the check. Vague statements can diminish the impact of your writing.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were checked for" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject underwent an examination or verification process. As Ludwig AI illustrates, it's commonly used to denote that something has been evaluated for a specific condition or item.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

15%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were checked for" is a grammatically sound and commonly used passive construction that signifies an examination or verification process. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread usage across scientific, news, and academic contexts. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying the purpose and criteria of the check. Alternatives such as "were verified for", "were inspected for", and "were assessed for" can provide nuanced variations depending on the context. By adhering to best practices and avoiding overgeneralization, you can effectively employ "were checked for" in your writing.

FAQs

What does "were checked for" mean?

The phrase "were checked for" means that something was examined or inspected to verify the presence, absence, or condition of a specific item or attribute.

How can I use "were checked for" in a sentence?

You can use "were checked for" to indicate that items, data, or conditions underwent a process of verification or examination. For example, "The samples "were checked for contamination" before analysis."

What are some alternatives to "were checked for"?

Alternatives include "were verified for", "were inspected for", or "were assessed for", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "were checked for" and "were tested for"?

While similar, "were checked for" implies a general examination, whereas "were tested for" often suggests a formal or scientific procedure to determine a specific outcome or characteristic. The choice depends on the level of rigor and the purpose of the examination.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: