Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were validated for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were validated for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the confirmation or verification of something for a specific purpose or context. Example: "The results of the experiment were validated for accuracy before publication."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(6)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Before running the Heckman selection model, data were validated for multicollinearity and heteroskedasticity.
All samples were validated for subsequent analysis with a RIN value of at least 6.0.
Science
Temperature functions for all kinetic and inactivation parameters were validated for chitin-immobilized yeast lactase (CIL).
The methods were validated for the parameters of linearity, matrix effects, precision, and accuracy.
Science
After filtering for abnormality, a total of 85,742 high-quality SNPs were validated for recombinant event determination.
Science
Newly developed methods were validated for linearity, accuracy, precision, limits of quantization and selectivity according to the ICH guidance.
Science
The designed genus-specific primer probe systems were validated for sensitivity, specificity and amplification in the presence of background DNA.
Results were validated for a selected panel of 5 metabolites measured from an additional cell culture experiment.
Science
Threshold values were validated for slab stability and asphalt materials, and applied for the designs of three rehabilitation projects.
The model and buffer correction algorithm were validated for various biochemically relevant buffers over the 6.1 10.7 pH range.
Furthermore, results were validated for a range of DNA substrates from small hairpins to long dsDNA sequences.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "were validated for" to clearly communicate that a process, method, or result has been formally checked and confirmed for a specific purpose or application. Ensure the context clearly specifies what was validated and for what reason.
Common error
Avoid using "were validated for" without specifying the parameters or conditions under which the validation occurred. Ambiguity can undermine the credibility of the validation. For example, instead of saying 'The method was validated', specify 'The method was validated for linearity, accuracy, and precision'.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were validated for" functions as a passive verb phrase indicating that a subject has undergone a process of verification or confirmation to ensure its suitability for a specific purpose or context. Ludwig AI supports this as correct and usable English.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "were validated for" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive verb phrase, particularly in scientific and technical writing, to indicate that something has been formally verified or confirmed for a specific purpose. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability. The key is to ensure clarity by specifying what was validated and the parameters of the validation. Alternatives like "were verified for" or "were confirmed for" can be used depending on the nuance you want to convey. Avoiding ambiguity and providing sufficient detail will enhance the credibility of your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were verified for
Emphasizes confirmation of truth or accuracy through evidence.
were confirmed for
Highlights the establishment of certainty regarding a specific aspect.
were authenticated for
Focuses on proving genuineness or legitimacy for a particular purpose.
were checked for
Indicates an examination process to ensure correctness or compliance.
were assessed for
Implies an evaluation to determine the suitability or value for a given purpose.
were tested for
Highlights a process of subjecting something to tests to determine its properties or capabilities.
were approved for
Indicates formal acceptance or authorization for a specific use.
were qualified for
Emphasizes meeting the necessary standards or requirements for something.
were demonstrated for
Shows something was proved or made clear by giving evidence or examples.
were certified for
Highlights the provision of official recognition that confirms certain standards are met.
FAQs
How can I use "were validated for" in a sentence?
The phrase "were validated for" indicates that something has been formally checked and confirmed for a specific purpose. For example, "The assays "were validated for" dilutional linearity, sample parallelism, accuracy, and precision".
What are some alternatives to "were validated for"?
Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "were verified for", "were confirmed for", or "were authenticated for" to convey a similar meaning.
What does it mean for results to be "validated for" something?
When results "were validated for" a particular aspect, it means that tests or procedures have been performed to confirm that the results are accurate, reliable, and suitable for that specific application or measurement.
Is it appropriate to use "were validated for" in non-scientific contexts?
While "were validated for" is common in scientific and technical writing, it can be used in other contexts where formal verification or confirmation is needed. However, in less formal settings, simpler terms like "were checked for" or "were approved for" might be more appropriate.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested