were reported as

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were reported as" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when conveying information that has been communicated or documented by others, often in a formal or journalistic context. Example: "The results of the study were reported as inconclusive, prompting further research."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Injuries were reported as well.

Wikipedia

They were reported as missing on Monday.

Independent

Two deaths were reported as acute complications.

The Journal of Pediatrics

All data were reported as mean ± SD.

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

Costs were reported as mean €/migraine attack.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Quantitative data were reported as medians (range).

Annals of Intensive Care

Data were reported as mean ± SD.

Chemistry Central Journal

Results were reported as mean ± standard error.

International Journal of Bipolar Disorders

Twenty (74 %) CTs were reported as normal.

Annals of Intensive Care

Colony counts were reported as counts per gram of tissue.

The American Journal of Emergency Medicine

Results were reported as a percentage of CD4+ lymphocytes.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were reported as", ensure the source of the information is clear to maintain credibility. For example, "The findings were reported as statistically significant in the New England Journal of Medicine".

Common error

While "were reported as" is grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice can make your writing sound weak. Consider using active voice where appropriate to make your writing more direct and engaging.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were reported as" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating how something has been communicated or documented. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in various contexts, emphasizing its role in conveying information from external sources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were reported as" is a common and grammatically correct passive construction used to relay information from external sources. As Ludwig AI confirms, its frequency is high across diverse contexts, especially in scientific and news reporting. While versatile, ensure clarity by specifying the source and consider active voice alternatives for more direct writing. Ludwig provides numerous examples demonstrating proper usage and context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were described as

Broadly refers to providing details or attributes of something.

were characterized as

Focuses on the act of describing something's qualities or nature.

were presented as

Focuses on how information was showcased or displayed.

were classified as

Highlights the act of categorizing something into a specific group.

were identified as

Emphasizes the recognition or discovery of something's nature or identity.

were noted as

Suggests a formal observation or recording of information.

were labeled as

Highlights the act of assigning a specific name or identifier.

were designated as

Implies an official assignment or naming of something.

were regarded as

Emphasizes a particular opinion or perspective about something.

were understood as

Focuses on the interpretation or comprehension of something.

FAQs

How can I use "were reported as" in a sentence?

Use "were reported as" to indicate how information was communicated or documented. For example, "The study results "were reported as" inconclusive".

What's a good alternative to "were reported as"?

Alternatives include "were described as", "were classified as", or "were identified as depending on the context".

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "were reported as"?

While "were reported as" is passive, it's often appropriate when the source or actor is less important than the information itself. However, using active voice can make your writing more direct.

What does "were reported as" imply about the information?

It implies that the information comes from an external source and is not necessarily the speaker's own opinion or observation.