Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were classified as

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"were classified as" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate something has been sorted into a particular group or category based on certain characteristics or features. For example: "The different types of bacteria were classified as Gram-positive or Gram-negative."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Consequently, no torts were classified as criminal.

These fossils were classified as Cycadeoidea.

The deaths were classified as homicides.

News & Media

The Guardian

All Glomeromycota were classified as AMF.

Science & Research

Nature

Items were classified as benthic or pelagic.

Science & Research

Nature

Although these accessions were classified as var.

Science & Research

Nature

The follicles were classified as previously described17.

Science & Research

Nature

Half of those were classified as severe.

News & Media

The Guardian

Thirty-four patients were classified as Child class A, and 12 were classified as Child class B. Thirty patients were classified as Okuda stage I, 14 were classified as Okuda stage II, and two were classified as Okuda stage III.

Several compounds were classified as partial agonists.

Twenty-eight cases (25%) were classified as TNBC.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "were classified as" when you want to clearly indicate that items or concepts have been sorted into specific groups based on established criteria. This phrase is especially useful in formal writing, scientific reports, and academic papers where precision is important.

Common error

Avoid using incorrect prepositions with "classify". The correct form is "were classified as". Using prepositions like 'in' or 'under' can lead to grammatical errors and confusion. For instance, avoid saying "were classified in" or "were classified under".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were classified as" functions as a passive voice construction used to indicate that a subject has been assigned to a particular category or group. As Ludwig AI indicates, this construction implies a formal act of categorization based on specific criteria.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

44%

Academia

25%

News & Media

24%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were classified as" is a grammatically correct and very common passive construction that clearly indicates categorization based on established criteria. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is suitable for formal writing, scientific reports, and academic papers, where precision is important. Common contexts include science, academia, and news media, as indicated by the source analysis. When using this phrase, ensure the correct preposition 'as' is used to avoid grammatical errors. For alternative expressions, consider "were categorized as", "were grouped as", or "were designated as", depending on the desired nuance.

FAQs

How can I use "were classified as" in a sentence?

Use "were classified as" to show that items or concepts have been sorted into specific groups based on criteria. For example, "The documents "were classified as" confidential, secret, or top secret."

What are some alternatives to "were classified as"?

Alternatives include "were categorized as", "were grouped as", or "were designated as", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "were classified as" or "were considered as"?

"Were classified as" is more appropriate when referring to a formal or objective categorization process. "Were considered as" implies a subjective judgment or opinion. Choose the phrase that best reflects the nature of the categorization.

What's the difference between "were classified as" and "were identified as"?

"Were classified as" indicates a systematic sorting into predefined categories. "Were identified as" suggests a recognition or discovery of something's existing category. For example, "The new species "were identified as" distinct based on their genetic markers, and then "were classified as" belonging to a new genus."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: