Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were classified as
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"were classified as" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate something has been sorted into a particular group or category based on certain characteristics or features. For example: "The different types of bacteria were classified as Gram-positive or Gram-negative."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(20)
were categorized as
were grouped as
were designated as
were identified as
were labeled as
were considered as
were regarded as
were defined as
were assigned to
were categorised as
were described as
information classified as
become classified as
were included as
were filled as
were completed as
were used as
were determined as
were lysed as
is classified as
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Consequently, no torts were classified as criminal.
Encyclopedias
These fossils were classified as Cycadeoidea.
Academia
The deaths were classified as homicides.
News & Media
All Glomeromycota were classified as AMF.
Science & Research
Items were classified as benthic or pelagic.
Science & Research
Although these accessions were classified as var.
Science & Research
The follicles were classified as previously described17.
Science & Research
Half of those were classified as severe.
News & Media
Thirty-four patients were classified as Child class A, and 12 were classified as Child class B. Thirty patients were classified as Okuda stage I, 14 were classified as Okuda stage II, and two were classified as Okuda stage III.
Academia
Several compounds were classified as partial agonists.
Twenty-eight cases (25%) were classified as TNBC.
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "were classified as" when you want to clearly indicate that items or concepts have been sorted into specific groups based on established criteria. This phrase is especially useful in formal writing, scientific reports, and academic papers where precision is important.
Common error
Avoid using incorrect prepositions with "classify". The correct form is "were classified as". Using prepositions like 'in' or 'under' can lead to grammatical errors and confusion. For instance, avoid saying "were classified in" or "were classified under".
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were classified as" functions as a passive voice construction used to indicate that a subject has been assigned to a particular category or group. As Ludwig AI indicates, this construction implies a formal act of categorization based on specific criteria.
Frequent in
Science
44%
Academia
25%
News & Media
24%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
1%
Wiki
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were classified as" is a grammatically correct and very common passive construction that clearly indicates categorization based on established criteria. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is suitable for formal writing, scientific reports, and academic papers, where precision is important. Common contexts include science, academia, and news media, as indicated by the source analysis. When using this phrase, ensure the correct preposition 'as' is used to avoid grammatical errors. For alternative expressions, consider "were categorized as", "were grouped as", or "were designated as", depending on the desired nuance.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were categorized as
Synonymous, differing only in spelling preference (categorized vs classified).
were grouped as
Focuses on the action of grouping items together.
were designated as
Implies a more formal or official assignment to a category.
were labeled as
Highlights the act of applying a label to something.
were identified as
Emphasizes the discovery or recognition of something's category.
were considered as
Indicates a subjective judgment or opinion about the category.
were regarded as
Similar to 'considered as', but may imply a more widely held view.
were defined as
Focuses on providing a specific definition for the category.
were sorted into
Emphasizes the process of organizing items into different categories.
were assigned to
Implies a formal or organized allocation to a specific category.
FAQs
How can I use "were classified as" in a sentence?
Use "were classified as" to show that items or concepts have been sorted into specific groups based on criteria. For example, "The documents "were classified as" confidential, secret, or top secret."
What are some alternatives to "were classified as"?
Alternatives include "were categorized as", "were grouped as", or "were designated as", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to use "were classified as" or "were considered as"?
"Were classified as" is more appropriate when referring to a formal or objective categorization process. "Were considered as" implies a subjective judgment or opinion. Choose the phrase that best reflects the nature of the categorization.
What's the difference between "were classified as" and "were identified as"?
"Were classified as" indicates a systematic sorting into predefined categories. "Were identified as" suggests a recognition or discovery of something's existing category. For example, "The new species "were identified as" distinct based on their genetic markers, and then "were classified as" belonging to a new genus."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested