Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were described as
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"were described as" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to introduce a description of someone or something. For example: "The new recruits were described as ambitious, hardworking, and eager to learn."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
A quarter were described as urgent.
News & Media
Their wounds were described as nonlife-threatening.
News & Media
Government los ses were described as light.
News & Media
Their relations were described as strained.
News & Media
Davis and Gorrissen were described as irreplaceable.
News & Media
Six of them were described as militants.
News & Media
All were described as experienced offshore yachtsmen.
News & Media
The three were described as longtime friends.
News & Media
Sanitary arrangements were described as "precarious".
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
2 human-written examples
Each method is described, as follows.
Science
It is described as oligotrophic.
Encyclopedias
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "were described as" to introduce a summary or characterization of something based on existing accounts or observations. For example, "The effects of the medication were described as mild and temporary."
Common error
Avoid overusing passive voice with "were described as" to the point where the agent doing the describing is consistently omitted, as this can make your writing vague and less informative. Ensure that the source or basis of the description is clear when relevant.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were described as" functions as a passive reporting verb phrase. It introduces a description or characterization attributed to an unspecified source, indicating how something or someone was presented or perceived. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a valid and common way to introduce descriptive elements.
Frequent in
News & Media
63%
Science
23%
Formal & Business
6%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
2%
Wiki
2%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were described as" is a grammatically sound and widely used construction to introduce a description or characterization based on external sources. As Ludwig AI points out, it is a valid way to present how something or someone has been portrayed. It is most frequently encountered in news and media, scientific writing, and business contexts. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by referencing the source of the description when relevant, and avoid overusing the passive voice. Remember the alternatives "were characterized as", "were portrayed as", and "were labeled as", which offer subtle differences in meaning depending on the context.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were characterized as
Replaces 'described' with 'characterized', emphasizing the qualities attributed.
were portrayed as
Substitutes 'described' with 'portrayed', focusing on the image or representation conveyed.
were labeled as
Uses 'labeled' instead of 'described', highlighting a specific designation or classification.
were defined as
Replaces 'described' with 'defined', stressing a formal or precise explanation.
were regarded as
Changes 'described' to 'regarded', indicating a general opinion or assessment.
were known as
Uses 'known' instead of 'described', focusing on established recognition.
were considered to be
Replaces 'described' with 'considered to be', suggesting a thoughtful evaluation.
were referred to as
Substitutes 'described' with 'referred to', emphasizing the act of naming or alluding.
were depicted as
Uses 'depicted' instead of 'described', highlighting a visual or artistic representation.
were classified as
Replaces 'described' with 'classified', stressing a systematic categorization.
FAQs
How can I use "were described as" in a sentence?
Use "were described as" to introduce how something or someone was characterized based on external observations or reports. For example, "The economic conditions "were described as" challenging by several analysts".
What are some alternatives to "were described as"?
Alternatives include "were characterized as", "were portrayed as", or "were labeled as", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with descriptions?
While passive voice with "were described as" is grammatically correct, active voice can sometimes be more direct and engaging. Consider "Analysts described the economic conditions as challenging" for a more active construction.
What's the difference between "were described as" and "were considered as"?
"Were described as" typically indicates an external description or account, while "were considered as" suggests a subjective judgment or opinion. The choice depends on whether you're reporting a description or an assessment.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested