Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were omitted

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of the sentence "were omitted" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been removed or left out. Example: Some of the details were omitted from the report.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

(The words "not all" were omitted).

News & Media

The New York Times

What angles do you think were omitted?

News & Media

The New York Times

Stocks with losses were omitted.

News & Media

Forbes

Characters' names were omitted.

Note that ties were omitted.

Significantly small powers were omitted.

Cycles were omitted for simplicity.

These were omitted from the respective analyses.

Publications on developing countries were omitted.

Covariances and indicators were omitted for simplicity.

No texts were omitted or added.

News & Media

Vice
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "were omitted" in formal writing to maintain a professional tone and clearly communicate that certain elements have been intentionally left out.

Common error

Avoid using "were omitted" without specifying what exactly was omitted. Vague statements can confuse the reader. Always provide enough context so that the reader can follow the content without struggling.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were omitted" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something has been intentionally left out or excluded. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage. For example, "Details "were omitted" for clarity."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

57%

News & Media

35%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were omitted" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate intentional exclusion. As noted by Ludwig, it appears predominantly in scientific and news media contexts, lending itself to formal communication. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying what exactly was omitted and why. Alternatives include ""were excluded"" and ""were left out"", offering slight variations in nuance. Remember to use "were" with plural subjects.

FAQs

How can I use "were omitted" in a sentence?

You can use "were omitted" to indicate that certain elements have been intentionally left out. For example, "Some details "were omitted" for brevity."

What are some alternatives to using "were omitted"?

Alternatives include "were excluded", "were left out", or "were not included" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was omitted" instead of "were omitted"?

"Was omitted" is used for singular subjects, while "were omitted" is used for plural subjects. For example, "The detail was omitted" versus "The details "were omitted"."

What is the difference between "were omitted" and "were removed"?

"Were omitted" typically implies a deliberate exclusion, while "were removed" suggests a physical or direct taking away. You would say, "The irrelevant details "were omitted"" and "The damaged files were removed."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: