were not included

USAGE SUMMARY

"were not included" is a correct and usable phrase that is often used in written English.
For example: Participants who arrived late to the meeting were not included in the discussion.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But they were not included.

The Economist

Private sales were not included.

The Washington Post

Reintroduction sites were not included.

The Guardian

Vacation costs were not included.

The New York Times

Charter school teachers were not included.

The New York Times

Therefore, they were not included here.

Nature

But safety features were not included.

The Guardian

They were not included in yesterday's demonstrations.

The New York Times

But these words were not included".

The Guardian - Sport

(Prisoners were not included in the study).

The New York Times

Reporters, newsreaders or contributors were not included.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing research papers or reports, use "were not included" to clearly state what data, subjects, or factors were excluded from your analysis. This ensures transparency and helps readers understand the scope of your work.

Common error

Avoid vague statements about exclusions. Clearly define the criteria for excluding items or subjects to prevent ambiguity and ensure reproducibility of your work. For example, instead of saying "some participants were not included", specify "participants with incomplete data were not included".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were not included" functions as a passive voice construction indicating exclusion or omission. It's used to specify what items, individuals, or data points were deliberately left out or not considered in a particular context. Ludwig provides numerous examples across various domains.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

39%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were not included" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression for indicating exclusions across various contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it’s a clear and direct way to specify what hasn't been considered or incorporated in a particular analysis, study, or list. Its prevalence in scientific and news media suggests a formal to neutral register, emphasizing the need for clarity and transparency. To ensure precision, avoid vagueness in your exclusion criteria, and consider synonyms like "were excluded" or "were left out" to suit the tone of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were excluded

Direct synonym, focusing on the action of excluding.

were omitted

Emphasizes the act of leaving something out.

were left out

More informal way of saying something was not included.

did not feature

Highlights the absence of something or someone.

were absent from

Focuses on the lack of presence.

were not present in

Similar to "were absent from", but more formal.

were not a part of

Emphasizes the lack of belonging.

were not considered

Highlights the lack of consideration or evaluation.

were disregarded

Emphasizes the act of ignoring something.

were discounted

Focuses on the act of reducing importance.

FAQs

How can I use "were not included" in a sentence?

You can use "were not included" to specify exclusions in a study, list, or analysis. For example, "Participants who arrived late to the meeting "were not included" in the discussion."

What is a formal alternative to "were not included"?

A more formal alternative would be "were excluded". This maintains a professional tone suitable for academic or business writing.

What can I use instead of "were not included" in informal writing?

In informal writing, you could say "were left out" or "didn't make the cut". These options are more conversational.

Is there a difference between "were not included" and "were excluded"?

While similar, "were excluded" implies a more deliberate act of exclusion, whereas "were not included" can simply indicate absence or omission.