Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were linked to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were linked to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate a connection or relationship between two or more entities, often in the context of research, studies, or findings. Example: "The results of the study showed that the symptoms were linked to a specific environmental factor."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Three deaths were linked to Lotronex use.

News & Media

The New York Times

The 898 people were linked to one initial infected patient.

News & Media

The Guardian

The policy challenges were linked to this failure of imagination.

News & Media

The New York Times

They were linked to testicular damage, miscarriages and birth defects.

News & Media

The New York Times

The H5N1 bird flu infections were linked to poultry markets.

News & Media

The Guardian

Most of the rejected shipments were linked to drug residues.

News & Media

The New York Times

She believes the arrests were linked to Westgate.

News & Media

The Guardian

The bank accounts were linked to Said and other middlemen.

News & Media

The Guardian

Other sites were linked to as well.

News & Media

TechCrunch

were linked to the detrital fraction.

Four noiseless push-buttons were linked to a computer.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were linked to", ensure that the connection between the subjects is clear and supported by evidence.

Common error

Avoid using "were linked to" when the relationship is speculative or based on weak evidence. Use phrases like "might be linked to" or "are possibly associated with" to convey uncertainty.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were linked to" functions as a passive voice construction used to indicate a connection, association, or relationship between two or more entities. Ludwig examples show it connecting causes and effects, or items and their origins. Ludwig AI confirms that it is correct and usable in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

54%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "were linked to" is a versatile and grammatically sound construction used to indicate a connection or relationship between two or more elements. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's widely accepted and utilized in both scientific and journalistic contexts. While "were linked to" is appropriate for formal writing, it's crucial to ensure that the connection is clearly supported by evidence, avoiding overstatements when the relationship is speculative. Alternatives such as "were associated with" or "were connected to" can be used to add nuance to your writing. Remember to use "were linked to" when you want to establish a clear, supported relationship between different entities.

FAQs

How can I use "were linked to" in a sentence?

Use "were linked to" to show a connection or relationship between two or more things. For example, "The study showed that the symptoms "were linked to" a specific environmental factor."

What are some alternatives to "were linked to"?

You can use alternatives such as "were associated with", "were connected to", or "were related to" depending on the specific context.

Is it appropriate to use "were linked to" in formal writing?

Yes, "were linked to" is appropriate for formal writing, particularly in scientific, academic, and journalistic contexts where clear connections need to be established.

How does "were linked to" differ from "caused by"?

"Were linked to" indicates a relationship or association, while "caused by" implies a direct causal relationship. "The increase in sales "were linked to" the marketing campaign" suggests a correlation. "The illness was caused by a virus" indicates direct causation.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: