Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were associated with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"were associated with" is correct and usable in written English.
You might use this phrase when describing a connection between two ideas, people, or things. For example, "The symbols of the moon and stars were associated with Luna, the goddess of the night."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

All were associated with fast-moving glaciers.

The Bektashi dervishes were associated with 17.

"They were associated with Tutsis," the R.P.F.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Thousands of the unauthorized search terms were associated with Americans.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Frequent all-nighters were associated with problem users.

News & Media

The Guardian

Others, like "orange," were associated with archrival Princeton.

News & Media

The New York Times

None of the men were associated with Mr. bin Laden.

News & Media

The New York Times

Diuretics were associated with a greater risk reduction, 43percentt.

Bathing suits, she figured, were associated with vacations and fun.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Six deaths were associated with infant swings, the agency said.

News & Media

The New York Times

No deaths or injuries were associated with the problem.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were associated with", ensure the connection you're describing is clear and specific. Avoid vague associations that lack evidence or supporting details.

Common error

Avoid implying causation when only correlation exists. Just because two things "were associated with" each other does not mean one caused the other.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were associated with" functions as a passive voice construction indicating a connection, relationship, or link between two or more entities. It's frequently used to describe correlations or relationships without necessarily implying direct causation. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

33%

News & Media

30%

Science

25%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were associated with" is a versatile phrase used to indicate a connection or relationship between two or more entities. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in written English. The phrase is particularly common in academic, news, and scientific contexts, serving to establish correlations without necessarily implying causation. When using this phrase, ensure clarity and specificity in the described connection, avoiding overstatements of causation based solely on correlation. Alternative phrases like "were linked to" or "were connected to" can provide similar meanings with slightly different nuances. With a high expert rating and frequent usage, "were associated with" remains a valuable tool for expressing relationships across diverse fields.

FAQs

How can I use "were associated with" in a sentence?

Use "were associated with" to indicate a relationship or connection between two or more things. For instance, "The symptoms of the illness were associated with exposure to the toxin."

What are some alternatives to "were associated with"?

Alternatives include "were linked to", "were connected to", or "were related to", depending on the specific context and the nature of the relationship.

Is it correct to say "was associated with" instead of "were associated with"?

Use "was associated with" for singular subjects and "were associated with" for plural subjects. For example, "The study was associated with positive outcomes," versus "The studies were associated with positive outcomes."

What is the difference between "were associated with" and "were caused by"?

"Were associated with" indicates a correlation or relationship, while "were caused by" implies a direct causal link. For instance, symptoms might "were associated with" a virus, but complications "were caused by" a secondary infection.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: