were included

USAGE SUMMARY

"were included" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that was part of a group or set of items. For example: "The new items we bought for the office were included in the shipment we received."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Even guests were included.

The New York Times

Five studies were included.

Child Abuse & Neglect

Seven uncapped players were included.

Independent

"It's unfortunate we were included".

The New York Times

Eleven young individuals were included.

Gait & Posture

Twenty-two manuscripts were included.

Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research

Eleven VS patients were included.

Clinical Neurophysiology

Several sub-models were included.

Energy

Results: Four studies were included.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Only original studies were included.

Anesthésie & Réanimation

Overall, 10 articles were included.

European Journal of Cancer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "were included" when you want to emphasize that certain items or individuals were part of a larger set, collection, or process. For clarity, specify the criteria or context for inclusion.

Common error

Avoid using "was included" when referring to multiple subjects; ensure the verb agrees with the plural subject, using "were included" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were included" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject received the action of being added to a group, list, or set. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

63%

News & Media

33%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "were included" is a versatile and grammatically correct passive verb phrase used to indicate that certain items or individuals were part of a larger group, list, or process. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for various contexts. Predominantly found in scientific and news-related content, as shown by the example, "were included" serves to specify the composition of a set or the scope of a study. To use this phrase effectively, ensure subject-verb agreement and provide context for the inclusion criteria. Alternatives like "were comprised of" or "were encompassed" can be used to add nuance, but "were included" remains a clear and direct choice for indicating membership or belonging.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were comprised

Focuses on the components that make up the whole, emphasizing the composition.

were comprised of

Similar to "were comprised" but more explicit about the constituents.

were encompassed

Suggests a broader inclusion, as if something is surrounded or contained.

were incorporated

Highlights the act of formally adding something into a larger structure.

were featured

Emphasizes that something was prominently displayed or highlighted.

were integrated

Implies a seamless combination or blending into a cohesive whole.

were admitted

Focuses on granting entry or acceptance into a group or system.

were counted among

Indicates that something was considered as part of a specific group.

were listed

Highlights that something was formally recorded as part of a set.

were specified

Focuses on being explicitly mentioned or designated within a set of criteria.

FAQs

How do I use "were included" in a sentence?

Use "were included" to indicate that multiple items or people were part of a larger group or set. For example, "The necessary tools "were included" in the package".

What are some alternatives to "were included"?

Depending on the context, alternatives to "were included" could be "were comprised of", "were encompassed", or "were integrated".

Is it ever correct to use "was included" instead of "were included"?

Yes, use "was included" when the subject is singular. For example, "The manual "was included" in the box", whereas "The manuals "were included" in the box".

What's the difference between "were included" and "were involved"?

"Were included" implies being part of a group or set, while "were involved" suggests participation or engagement in an activity. For example, "The data points "were included" in the analysis", versus "The researchers "were involved" in the study".