was included

USAGE SUMMARY

"was included" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that something was a part of something else. For example: The sandwich included lettuce, tomatoes, and cheese, and a pickle was included as well.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Poker was included.

The Economist

Recrystallization was included.

Electrochimica Acta

No note was included.

The New York Times

Everyone was included.

The New York Times - Arts

(It was included).

The New Yorker

Full breakfast was included.

The New York Times - Travel

No bedding was included.

The New York Times - Travel

Ms. Jaafari's résumé was included.

The New York Times

A gulet cruise was included.

The Guardian - Travel

No reason for her departure was included.

The New York Times

Milwaukee was included on the list.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was included" to clearly indicate that something was part of a group, list, or process. Ensure the context makes it clear what the subject was included in.

Common error

Avoid using "was included" without clearly defining the scope or context of the inclusion. For example, instead of saying "The item was included", specify "The item was included in the final report".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was included" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject received the action of being added or contained within something else. Ludwig AI confirms this with numerous examples showing its prevalent use across varied contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was included" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase, primarily functioning as a passive construction to indicate that something was made part of a larger entity. Ludwig AI's analysis reveals its widespread use across diverse fields such as news, science, and academia, with a neutral register making it suitable for both formal and informal communication. The phrase effectively conveys information about composition and participation, making it a versatile tool for clear and precise writing. Remember to use it to indicate that something was part of a group, list, or process. Ensure the context makes it clear what the subject was included in. The high number of examples shows that it is suitable for various situations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was a component of

Highlights the role as a part or element.

formed part of

Uses a different verb to convey the idea of being a component.

was incorporated into

Suggests a more formal or structured inclusion.

was comprised of

Emphasizes the composition of the whole by its parts, including the subject.

was integrated within

Emphasizes the blending or merging into a larger system.

figured in

Indicates involvement or presence in a situation.

was encompassed by

Indicates being fully covered or contained within.

was featured in

Implies a prominent or highlighted inclusion.

was counted among

Suggests being one of several in a group or list.

was subsumed under

Implies being classified or categorized within.

FAQs

How can I use "was included" in a sentence?

Use "was included" to show that something was part of a larger whole. For instance, "The car rental "was included" in the vacation package."

What are some alternatives to "was included"?

You can use phrases like "was comprised of", "was incorporated into", or "formed part of" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "was include" instead of "was included"?

No, "was include" is grammatically incorrect. The correct past participle form of "include" is "included". Therefore, ""was included"" is the correct usage.

What is the difference between "was included" and "was involved"?

"Was included" means something was part of a whole, while "was involved" means something took part in an activity or event. For example, "The software update "was included" in the system maintenance", versus "He was involved in the project since its inception".