Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were integrated
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were integrated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the process of combining or incorporating different elements into a whole, often in a past context. Example: "The new software features were integrated into the existing system to enhance functionality."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(20)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Lastly, both saliency maps were integrated using Bayesian integration.
"Scene, song and dance were integrated seamlessly".
News & Media
Second, Egyptians were integrated in the army and soldiers were integrated into the local elite.
Academia
Montgomery's buses were integrated on December 21 1956.
News & Media
Peak areas were integrated at a wavelength of 215 nm.
Science & Research
The multiple visualizations were integrated, interoperable, and inspiring.
News & Media
The 2D-SAXS patterns were integrated using FIT2D software.
Science & Research
Algorithms were integrated into the ETWatch.
Science
The elementary and secondary schools were integrated with the universities.
Encyclopedias
Would it be better if it were integrated?
News & Media
Eventually they were integrated into the general population as domestic servants and farm laborers.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "were integrated" to describe the result of combining distinct elements into a unified system or structure. Be specific about what elements "were integrated" and the purpose of their integration.
Common error
Avoid using "were integrated" vaguely. Always clarify what components "were integrated" to prevent ambiguity. For example, instead of saying 'New features were integrated', specify 'New software features "were integrated" into the existing system'.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were integrated" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something (the subject) underwent the action of being integrated. This is evident in Ludwig's examples where different elements, such as technologies or features, "were integrated" into systems or structures.
Frequent in
Science
55%
News & Media
25%
Academia
10%
Less common in
Wiki
6%
Formal & Business
3%
Encyclopedias
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were integrated" is a grammatically sound and very common passive construction used to describe the combination of distinct elements into a unified whole. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and wide applicability across various contexts. It appears most frequently in scientific and news-related articles, with a neutral register suitable for diverse audiences. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying the elements that "were integrated" and the purpose of their integration. Alternatives like "were incorporated" or "were combined" can be used to provide subtle differences in meaning.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were incorporated
This alternative directly replaces "integrated" with a synonym, maintaining a similar meaning and grammatical structure.
were combined
This alternative uses a more general term for bringing elements together, suitable for various contexts.
were merged
This suggests a blending of elements to form a single entity, implying a closer union than just integration.
were assimilated
This alternative suggests that the elements were absorbed into a larger system, losing some individual identity.
were unified
This emphasizes the creation of a single, cohesive whole from disparate parts.
were synthesized
Implies elements were combined to create something entirely new and complex.
were woven together
Emphasizes the intertwined nature of the elements, often used metaphorically.
were connected
Offers a simpler, more direct way to describe the joining of elements, suitable for less formal contexts.
were linked
Similar to "connected", but implies a more purposeful or structured relationship between elements.
were amalgamated
Implies a more thorough blending of components, suggesting a loss of individual identity.
FAQs
How can I use "were integrated" in a sentence?
The phrase "were integrated" is used to describe the process of combining different elements into a unified whole. For example, "The new technologies "were integrated" into the existing framework to improve efficiency".
What are some alternatives to "were integrated"?
Alternatives include "were incorporated", "were combined", or "were merged", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it correct to say "was integrated" instead of "were integrated"?
No, "was integrated" is used for singular subjects, while "were integrated" is used for plural subjects. For example, "The feature was integrated", but "The features "were integrated"".
What's the difference between "were integrated" and "were included"?
"Were integrated" implies a more thorough combination and blending of elements, while "were included" simply suggests that elements were added without necessarily being fully combined. For example, features "were integrated" implies they're now a seamless part of the system, while features "were included" simply means they're present.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested