Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were assessed for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"were assessed for" is correct and can be used in written English.
This expression basically means "were evaluated or examined". For example: The students were assessed for their understanding of the material.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Parasitism rates were assessed for parasitic Hymenoptera.

Science & Research

Nature

Sorted CD4CD25 hi) cells were assessed for functional activity.

Distal femurs were assessed for microstructural changes.

Only 12percentt of H.I.V.-positive pregnant women were assessed for whether they needed treatment themselves.

News & Media

The New York Times

Each year, the children were assessed for mental and motor development.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Cell/drug mixtures were assessed for the relative abundance of each yeast species by flow cytometry.

Science & Research

Nature

From October 2005 to July 2007, 267 patients were assessed for eligibility (Figure 2).

Science & Research

Nature

Twenty-five patients were assessed for toxicity.

Sixty patients were assessed for eligibility.

All wounds were assessed for infection.

Thirty-five articles were assessed for eligibility.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were assessed for", ensure the object being assessed and the criteria for assessment are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For instance, instead of "Patients were assessed", specify "Patients were assessed for eligibility" or "Patients were assessed for toxicity".

Common error

Avoid using "were assessed for" with vague or undefined criteria. For example, stating that "Data were assessed for quality" without specifying what constitutes 'quality' leaves room for misinterpretation. Instead, clarify the specific metrics used in the assessment, such as "Data were assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were assessed for" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject received an evaluation or examination to determine specific characteristics or eligibility. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and provides numerous examples across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

58%

Academia

26%

News & Media

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were assessed for" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase indicating that a subject underwent evaluation. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and showcases its usage across various fields. As this tool demonstrates, the phrase appears most frequently in scientific and academic contexts, suggesting its suitability for formal writing. To ensure clarity, always specify the criteria used during assessment. By avoiding vague statements and using precise language, you can effectively communicate the evaluation process in your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "were assessed for" in a sentence?

The phrase "were assessed for" is used to indicate that something or someone underwent an evaluation to determine specific characteristics or eligibility. For example, "Patients "were assessed for toxicity"" or "Articles "were assessed for study quality"".

What are some alternatives to "were assessed for"?

Alternatives include phrases like "were evaluated for", "were examined for", or "were investigated for", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "were assesses for" instead of "were assessed for"?

No, "were assesses for" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is "were assessed for", where "assessed" is the past participle of the verb "assess".

What does "were assessed for" mean?

The phrase "were assessed for" means that certain items, people, or data underwent a process of evaluation or examination to determine specific qualities, eligibility, or compliance with certain standards.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: