Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were categorized as
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were categorized as" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing how items, people, or concepts have been classified or grouped into specific categories. Example: "The species were categorized as endangered due to their declining population."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
All adverse events were categorized as mild.
Science
Extremely Photoshopped images were categorized as "oh, honey".
News & Media
An additional 8.2% were categorized as "Other".
Science
Thus, CHOP+ cells were categorized as those having >15 MFI.
Science & Research
Materials forgotten during T1 were categorized as forgotten trials, and those remembered during T2 were categorized as long-duration trials.
Science
Subjects doing things with their tongues were categorized as "just no".
News & Media
Photos of extremely unappealing but overwhelmingly confident males named Harvey were categorized as "run".
News & Media
The most secret task-force operations were categorized as Special Access Programs, or S.A.P.s.
News & Media
If participants reported PA of <150 min per week, they were categorized as 'non-exercisers'.
Science & Research
Due to the diversity of floor types, rooms were categorized as carpeted or bare.
Science & Research
The review authors' judgments were categorized as low risk, high risk, or unclear risk of bias.
Science & Research
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were categorized as", ensure the categorization criteria are clear and consistent to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify the rules or standards used for the classification.
Common error
Avoid using overlapping categories. Ensure that each item fits uniquely into its assigned category to maintain clarity and prevent confusion.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were categorized as" functions as a passive voice construction used to indicate how items, people, or concepts have been classified or grouped into specific categories. Ludwig provides numerous examples showcasing its use in various contexts.
Frequent in
Science
63%
News & Media
21%
Academia
13%
Less common in
Formal & Business
3%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were categorized as" is a grammatically sound and frequently used construction for indicating classification or grouping, as affirmed by Ludwig. Its prevalence is especially notable within scientific and academic domains, though it also appears in news and media. To ensure clarity, it is crucial to define clear and consistent categorization criteria, while avoiding overlaps. By understanding the nuances of this phrase and related alternatives like "were classified as", you can enhance the precision and effectiveness of your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were classified as
This alternative directly replaces "categorized" with "classified", maintaining a high degree of semantic similarity.
were grouped as
This alternative uses "grouped" instead of "categorized", focusing on the act of forming groups.
were designated as
This alternative, employing "designated", suggests a more formal or official assignment to a category.
were labeled as
Using "labeled" emphasizes the act of assigning a label to indicate the category.
were identified as
This alternative, with "identified", highlights the recognition of something belonging to a certain category.
were sorted into
This phrase focuses on the action of sorting items into specific categories.
were assigned to
Here, "assigned to" suggests a direct allocation to a category.
were considered to be
This alternative, employing "considered to be", introduces a degree of subjective judgment in the categorization.
were regarded as
This option, "regarded as", focuses on the perception or view of something's category.
were deemed as
This option, "deemed as", is a more formal way of saying considered, often implying a decision or judgement.
FAQs
How do I use "were categorized as" in a sentence?
Use "were categorized as" to describe how items, people, or concepts have been sorted into specific groups based on shared characteristics. For instance, "The books "were categorized as" fiction or nonfiction."
What is a good alternative to "were categorized as"?
Alternatives include phrases like "were classified as", "were grouped as", or "were labeled as", depending on the context.
Is it better to say "were categorized as" or "were classified as"?
Both "were categorized as" and "were classified as" are correct and often interchangeable. The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey. "Classified" may suggest a more formal or official sorting.
How does "were categorized as" differ from "were described as"?
"Were categorized as" implies a structured sorting into predefined groups, while "were described as" simply means providing a description of something's qualities or features without necessarily placing it into a specific category.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested