Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was revised from

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was revised from" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to a changed or updated version of something, usually written material. For example: "The policy was revised from the 2018 version to reflect current workplace regulations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

48 human-written examples

The first quarter was revised from 0.4%to0.52%2%.

The previous week's figure was revised from 422,000.

News & Media

The New York Times

Thereafter, the statute was revised from time to time, notably in 1802, 1831, 1870, and 1891.

The December fall was revised from a previously reported decline of 0.6percentt.

News & Media

The New York Times

The January tally was revised from 112,000 to 97,000.

News & Media

The New York Times

The November drop was revised from a previously reported 0.2percentt decline.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

12 human-written examples

In the days before he died, he was revising, from his hospital bed, the autobiography he planned to publish on the Internet.

News & Media

The New York Times

They will be revised from time to time so note the revision dates.

Scripts are revised from performance to performance.

News & Media

The New York Times

Such notice may be revised from time to time.

Entries may be revised from the form in which they were first submitted.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was revised from", make sure to provide context regarding what the original state was and what changes were made. This adds clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was revised from" when you simply mean something was 'changed'. "Revised" implies a formal review and alteration, not just any modification. If the change was minor or informal, a term like 'modified' or 'adjusted' may be more appropriate.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was revised from" functions as a passive construction indicating that something has undergone a process of review and alteration. It emphasizes that a prior version existed and has been formally changed. Ludwig contains many examples that showcase this usage, as confirmed by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Science

36%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was revised from" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to indicate that something has been formally changed from a previous version. As demonstrated by Ludwig's examples, it is frequently used in news, scientific, and academic contexts. While versatile, it's important to reserve its usage for situations involving a formal review and alteration, differentiating it from simpler terms like 'changed' or 'modified'. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in various written contexts.

FAQs

How is "was revised from" used in a sentence?

Use "was revised from" to indicate that something has been formally changed or updated from a previous version. For example, "The policy "was revised from" the 2018 version to include new regulations".

What are some alternatives to "was revised from"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "was updated from", "was modified from", or "was amended from". Each carries a slightly different nuance regarding the type and formality of the change.

Which is correct, "was revised from" or "was changed from"?

Both are correct, but "was revised from" implies a more formal and thorough review and alteration process than "was changed from". Use 'revised' when the change involved careful consideration and a specific purpose.

What's the difference between "was adapted from" and "was revised from"?

"Was adapted from" means something was modified to suit a different purpose or condition, while ""was revised from"" means it was formally reviewed and altered, often to correct errors or update information.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: