was recognized

USAGE SUMMARY

"was recognized" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is the past tense of the verb "recognize," which means to notice, be aware of, or recognize someone or something. Example: After years of hard work, Jane's efforts were recognized by her colleagues.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I was recognized".

The New York Times

Until I was recognized.

The New York Times

Her difference was recognized.

The New Yorker

The essential Drama Book Shop was recognized.

The New Yorker

Its independence was recognized only by Turkey.

Encyclopedia Britannica

But within weeks she was recognized.

The New York Times

"I was recognized on the street".

The New York Times

Mr. Pockriss's talent was recognized early.

The New York Times - Arts

"So I'm glad that was recognized.

The New York Times - Sports

Philip was recognized as king consort.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The title was recognized until 1945.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was recognized" when you want to emphasize the object or person receiving recognition rather than the agent doing the recognizing. It's effective in passive voice constructions where the receiver of the action is more important.

Common error

Ensure the context clearly indicates who or what did the recognizing. Overuse of the passive voice without specifying the agent can lead to vagueness and weaken your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was recognized" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that a subject received acknowledgment, identification, or acceptance. As shown by Ludwig, this construction is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

27%

Encyclopedias

9%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was recognized" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive verb phrase that indicates acknowledgment, identification, or acceptance. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread use across various contexts, particularly in news, science, and encyclopedic writing. When using this phrase, ensure clarity about who or what is doing the recognizing to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternative phrases like "was acknowledged" or "gained recognition" to vary your writing while maintaining accuracy. The choice between active and passive voice depends on whether you want to emphasize the receiver or the giver of the recognition.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was acknowledged

Replaces "recognized" with a synonym, focusing on the act of admitting or accepting something.

was identified

Focuses on the act of pinpointing or establishing the identity of something or someone.

was known

Shifts the focus to the state of being known, rather than the act of recognizing.

was distinguished

Highlights the act of differentiating something from others.

was credited

Emphasizes the attribution of something to a particular person or source.

gained recognition

Active voice, emphasizing the process of achieving recognition.

received acknowledgement

Noun form of acknowledgement, indicating receipt of recognition.

was celebrated

Highlights the positive aspect of being recognized, suggesting praise or honor.

was honored

Focuses on the act of bestowing honor or respect.

was validated

Implies confirmation or verification of something's worth or accuracy.

FAQs

How is "was recognized" used in a sentence?

"Was recognized" indicates that someone or something received acknowledgment or identification. For instance, "Her talent "was recognized" early in her career".

What are some alternatives to "was recognized"?

You can use alternatives like "was acknowledged", "was identified", or "gained recognition" depending on the context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when using "was recognized"?

Using the passive voice with "was recognized" is appropriate when the focus is on the recipient of the recognition rather than the recognizer. If the recognizer is important, active voice may be preferable (e.g., "The committee recognized her efforts").

What's the difference between "was recognized" and "was considered"?

"Was recognized" implies that something was acknowledged or identified, while "was considered" suggests that something was taken into account or thought about. Something "was recognized" if it was acknowledged, whereas something "was considered" if it was evaluated.