Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was identified

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was identified" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been identified or recognized in some way. For example, "The suspect was identified by witnesses."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Neither man was identified.

No perpetrator was identified.

News & Media

The New York Times

Neither was identified publicly.

News & Media

The New York Times

Neither was identified yesterday.

News & Media

The New York Times

Neither was identified.

News & Media

The New York Times

Neither officer was identified.

News & Media

The New York Times

Neither worker was identified.

News & Media

The New York Times

A juvenile was identified.

No specific target was identified.

News & Media

The New York Times

ODAP was identified in 1964.

News & Media

The New Yorker

9. was identified in Lochaber?

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was identified" when you want to emphasize that a process of identification or recognition took place. For example, "The cause of the error was identified during the investigation".

Common error

Don't use "was identified" when a simpler verb like "found" or "recognized" would suffice. Overusing passive voice can make your writing sound unnecessarily formal or convoluted.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was identified" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject has undergone a process of recognition or discovery. As Ludwig AI confirms, this structure is grammatically sound and widely applicable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Academia

32%

Science

31%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was identified" is a grammatically correct and widely used passive construction that indicates a process of recognition or discovery. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its prevalence in news, academic, and scientific writing lends it a formal tone. While versatile, it's crucial to avoid overuse and ensure it appropriately conveys the emphasis on the identification process rather than the identifier. Alternatives like "was recognized" or "was discovered" may be more suitable in certain contexts.

FAQs

How can I use "was identified" in a sentence?

Use "was identified" to indicate that something was recognized or determined, often through a specific process. For example, "The problem "was identified" during testing".

What are some alternatives to "was identified"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "was recognized", "was detected", or "was discovered".

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was identified"?

The choice depends on the context. Passive voice, as in "was identified", is useful when the actor is unknown or unimportant. Active voice is better when you want to emphasize who did the identifying.

What's the difference between "was identified" and "became identified"?

"Was identified" implies a single act of recognition. "Became identified" suggests a gradual process or a change in status over time.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: