was considered

USAGE SUMMARY

"was considered" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the opinion of someone in the past. For example: "The policy change was considered to be too drastic by many of the members."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It was considered ungentlemanly.

Independent

"It was considered shameful".

The New Yorker

I was considered "superior".

The New Yorker

Gaynor was considered incorruptible.

The New York Times

"It was considered impolite".

The New York Times - Style

She was considered light.

The New York Times

This was considered normal.

The Guardian

It was considered unrealistic.

The Guardian - Sport

It was considered vulgar".

The Guardian - Opinion

Auditing was considered rude.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

I was considering that.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was considered" to present information as an established viewpoint or a past assessment. It's effective for summarizing historical perspectives or widely held beliefs.

Common error

Avoid overusing "was considered" and other passive constructions. Too much passive voice can make your writing seem vague or indirect. Consider active voice alternatives when appropriate to make your writing more direct and engaging.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was considered" functions as a passive construction used to indicate that something was viewed, judged, or believed in a certain way at some point in the past. As Ludwig AI explains, it's grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Academia

25%

Science

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was considered" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, highlighting its role in expressing past opinions or beliefs. Its versatility makes it suitable for neutral writing, commonly appearing in news, academic papers, and scientific reports. When employing this phrase, it's crucial to ensure its fit within the context, avoiding overuse of the passive voice to maintain clear and engaging writing. As the examples demonstrate, the phrase is well-integrated across different domains, solidifying its place in everyday usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was deemed

Replaces "considered" with a more formal synonym, emphasizing a judgment or decision.

was regarded as

Emphasizes the perception or view held by others.

was thought to be

Indicates a belief or opinion about something.

was viewed as

Highlights the perspective or angle from which something is seen.

was believed to be

Suggests a generally held conviction or faith.

was judged to be

Implies a formal assessment or evaluation.

was recognized as

Indicates acknowledgment or acceptance of something's status.

was understood as

Focuses on the comprehension or interpretation of something.

people thought

Rephrases the passive construction into an active one to make the phrase less formal.

it appeared to be

Shifts focus to the apparent nature of something.

FAQs

How can I use "was considered" in a sentence?

"Was considered" is used to describe a past opinion or belief. For example, "In the past, this "was considered normal"".

What are some alternatives to "was considered"?

Alternatives include "was deemed", "was regarded as", and "was thought to be". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was considered"?

While "was considered" is a passive construction, its appropriateness depends on the context. Active voice (e.g., "people thought") can be more direct, but passive voice is suitable when emphasizing the object or the action rather than the actor.

What's the difference between "was considered" and "is considered"?

"Was considered" refers to a past assessment, whereas "is considered" indicates a current assessment or opinion. The choice depends on whether the viewpoint is historical or contemporary.