Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was incorporated into

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was incorporated into" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the process of including or integrating something into a larger whole or system. Example: "The new policy was incorporated into the existing framework to enhance efficiency."

✓ Grammatically correct

Encyclopedias

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It was incorporated into France in 1766.

A similar tail was incorporated into zolpidem.

News & Media

The New Yorker

In 1918 it was incorporated into Yugoslavia.

Balkh was incorporated into Afghanistan in 1850.

All of this was incorporated into the drama.

Formerly a lordship, it was incorporated into Castile in 1332.

It was incorporated into the Republic of Indonesia in 1950.

In 42 bc the province was incorporated into Italy.

After the war Western Pomerania was incorporated into Poland.

It was incorporated into the Ottoman Empire in 1516.

It was incorporated into the Russian Empire in 1782.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was incorporated into" when you want to emphasize the process of something becoming an integral part of a larger system or entity. For example, "The new features were incorporated into the software to improve user experience."

Common error

Avoid using "was incorporated into" if the element is merely added as an accessory or an option, rather than fundamentally changing the core structure or function. A better choice might be "was added to" or "was included with" in these cases.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was incorporated into" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject has been included or integrated into something else. This construction is frequently used to describe how elements become part of larger systems or structures, as seen in Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

36%

News & Media

29%

Encyclopedias

16%

Less common in

Wiki

6%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was incorporated into" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction for describing the process of integrating an element into a larger system. As Ludwig AI confirms, it’s common in encyclopedias, news, and scientific writing. Remember to use it when the element truly becomes an integral part, and consider alternatives like "was integrated into" for seamless blending or "was included in" for simple inclusion. Avoid it for superficial additions.

FAQs

How can I use "was incorporated into" in a sentence?

Use "was incorporated into" to describe the process of integrating something into a larger entity or system. For example, "The new clause was incorporated into the contract", or "The latest research was incorporated into the design of the bridge".

What are some alternatives to "was incorporated into"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "was integrated into", "was included in", "was absorbed into", or "became part of".

Is there a difference between "was incorporated into" and "was integrated into"?

While similar, "was incorporated into" generally implies a more formal or structural inclusion, whereas "was integrated into" suggests a smoother, more seamless blending. The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When is it incorrect to use "was incorporated into"?

It's generally incorrect to use "was incorporated into" if the element is only loosely connected or superficially added. In such cases, phrases like "was added to" or "was attached to" might be more appropriate.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: