was comprised of

USAGE SUMMARY

"was comprised of" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to state that something consisted of a certain number of parts. For example, "The presentation was comprised of three sections: an introduction, a detailed overview, and a conclusion."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Section was comprised of Pub.

Cornell University

The class was comprised of two parts.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Alas! the entrée was comprised of SPAM.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The workshop was comprised of three sessions.

Cornell University

The previous coalition government was comprised of 18 parties.

The New York Times

Each set was comprised of five 384-well plates.

Nature

Each element was comprised of a single, unbiased pHEMT.

Microelectronics Journal

The flyer was comprised of a rapid prototyped alumina ceramic.

International Journal of Impact Engineering

The James family was comprised of two further brothers and a sister.

The Guardian - Opinion

Our first prototype was comprised of components borrowed from a German company.

The Guardian

Deitch's sample was comprised of 365 students, 77% of the possible 474.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was comprised of" to clearly and directly state the components of something. For example, "The team was comprised of engineers, designers, and marketers."

Common error

While "was comprised of" is correct, avoid saying "comprised of" when you mean "composed of". "Comprise" means to include or contain, so the whole comprises the parts. Thus, it's more accurate to say something "is composed of" its elements.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was comprised of" functions as a verb phrase indicating the composition or constitution of something. As evidenced by Ludwig, it connects a subject with its constituent parts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

36%

News & Media

30%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was comprised of" is a grammatically correct and widely used phrase to describe the composition of something. According to Ludwig, while some grammar purists prefer "composed of", "was comprised of" is commonly accepted in various contexts including science, news, and academia. When writing, remember that the phrase is best used to clearly and directly state the components. Also consider alternatives like "consisted of" or "included" to add variety to your writing. The analysis demonstrates that Ludwig AI confirms the correctness and usability of this phrase in English writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was composed of

Uses a different verb to convey a nearly identical meaning.

consisted of

Employs a different verb tense to indicate the elements that made up something.

included

Indicates that something was part of a larger whole.

was made up of

Replaces "comprised" with a more informal phrasal verb.

contained

Suggests that something held or encompassed certain elements.

constituted

Uses a more formal verb to describe the composition.

was formed from

Highlights the process of creation or assembly.

incorporated

Implies that elements were integrated into a whole.

embraced

Suggests a more inclusive or comprehensive composition.

encompassed

Indicates that something included a range of elements.

FAQs

How can I use "was comprised of" in a sentence?

Use "was comprised of" to indicate what something consisted of. For instance, "The committee "was comprised of" members from various departments."

What's a more formal alternative to "was comprised of"?

A more formal alternative is "was constituted of". For example, "The board was constituted of senior executives and independent advisors."

Is there a simpler way to say "was comprised of"?

Yes, you could say "consisted of" or "included". For example, "The meal consisted of three courses" or "The presentation included a Q&A session."

What's the difference between "was comprised of" and "was composed of"?

While both phrases are often used interchangeably, "was composed of" is generally considered more grammatically precise. "Comprise" means 'to include or contain', so technically, the whole comprises the parts. However, in common usage, ""was comprised of"" is widely accepted.