was edited by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was edited by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something was edited or modified by someone else. For example: "This essay was edited by my professor before it was submitted."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

That collection was edited by Robert Nowell.

The Guardian - Books

The amateur footage was edited by Greenpoint Pictures.

The New York Times

This course was edited by Sharon Kay.

Columbia University

De contemptu mundi was edited by H.C. Hoskier in 1929.

Britannica

It was edited by one Ernest Henry Shackleton.

The New Yorker

It was edited by Robert Salladay and Robert J Rosenthal.

The Guardian

It was edited by the publication for length and clarity.

Harvard University

His important correspondence with monarchs, popes, and scholars was edited by Ernst Dümmeler (1898).

Britannica

The monthly column of letters from readers was edited by Susan Kirby.

The New York Times

It was founded in 1910 and, for its first 24 years, was edited by W.E.B.

Britannica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

This manuscript was edited by Mr. Ovid Da Silva.

BMC Infectious Diseases

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was edited by", ensure that the context clearly indicates what was edited (e.g., a document, video, or article) and who performed the editing.

Common error

Ensure clarity by explicitly stating what "was edited by" whom. Vague references can confuse the reader about the subject and the editor.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was edited by" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a particular piece of work underwent a process of revision and modification. Ludwig AI confirms the proper usage, showing it clearly indicates who performed the editing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Academia

22%

Encyclopedias

16%

Less common in

Science

14%

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was edited by" is a grammatically sound and widely used phrase for attributing editing credit. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage. The phrase is commonly found in news, academic, and encyclopedic contexts. To ensure clarity, always specify what "was edited by" whom. Alternatives like "was revised by" or "was proofread by" offer similar meanings with slightly different nuances. Using this phrase effectively involves clearly stating the subject and editor to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was revised by

Replaces "edited" with "revised", suggesting a more thorough or substantial modification.

was modified by

Indicates that changes or alterations were made by a particular person.

was corrected by

Implies that errors were fixed or amended by someone.

was proofread by

Specifies that the action was focused on correcting errors in grammar and spelling.

was adapted by

Suggests that the original material was changed to suit a different purpose or audience.

was curated by

Implies a selection and arrangement of content, often with a specific theme or focus.

was prepared by

Indicates the content was put together or made ready by someone, often for publication.

was overseen by

Suggests that someone supervised the editing process.

was finalized by

Indicates that someone made the final changes or approved the edited version.

editing done by

This is a different construction that focuses on the editing action.

FAQs

How can I use "was edited by" in a sentence?

You can use "was edited by" to credit the person or entity that made revisions to a piece of work. For example, "The report "was edited by" the senior manager."

What are some alternatives to "was edited by"?

Alternatives include phrases like "was revised by", "was proofread by", or "was corrected by", depending on the specific type of editing performed.

Is it necessary to mention who "was edited by" if the editing was minor?

While not always necessary, crediting the editor, even for minor edits, can be a good practice, especially in academic or professional contexts. It acknowledges their contribution to the final product. If the edits were substantial, it is important to give credit.

What's the difference between "was edited by" and "was written by"?

"Was written by" indicates the author of the original content, while "was edited by" indicates the person who revised or modified existing content. They refer to different roles in the creation process.